Search results

Reply: 1.1.1.1.1.1.2.2.1.1.1.3.1.1.1.1.1.1.2.2.3.1.1.1.1.1 From: Jeremy Laws TW - marriage here isn't the issue! If you had been married 10 times it still wouldn't count. As you have no assets you are not allowed to comment:) This is an investment forum, you can learn a lot here. Go and dip...

Protect Assets - Marriage Counselling 101 Reply: 1.1.1.1.1.1.2.2.1.1.1.3.1.1.1.1.1.1.2.2.1.1.1.2.1.1.2.1 From: Jeremy Laws TW - after only the first sentence of your reply you are IMHE wrong. A LOT of people marry for money. I am firmly of the opinion that they earn every cent of it, but in...

Protect Assets - Marriage Counselling 101 Reply: 1.1.1.1.1.1.2.2.1.1.1.3.1.1.1.1.1.1.2.2.1.1.1.2.1.1 From: Jeremy Laws Not sure about the young and naive Sim, but the rest was true!;) Your strategy of never buying anything is the perfect defence of course - so I suspect you too are also...

Reply: 1.1.1.1.1.1.2.2.1.1.1.3.1.1.1.1.1.1.2.2.1.1.1.1 From: Jeremy Laws Agree totally MIcheal. It would need updating as rules change, but I do think it could help a lot of people. (ME!) It would also be interesting to show a game plan to different lawyers to get a different slant on ideas...

Reply: 1.1.1.1.1.1.2.2.1.1.1.3.1.1.1.1.1.1.2.2.1.1 From: Jeremy Laws MIcheal, The booby trap idea I have half implemented in my will - I congratulate you! I think it is a superb idea for some of us to pursue a protection plan together. At least a rough guide. I have a superb lawyer who runs...

Reply: 1.1.1.1.1.1.2.2.1.1.1.3.1.1.1.1.1 From: Jeremy Laws Another point I thought of. Using a successful investor as an example if anything happened. It would be financially better to give all the assets to the successful investor, as MG says they have the skills to run it, and will multiply...

Reply: 1.1.1.1.1.1.2.2.1.1.1 From: Jeremy Laws Micheal, Are you suggesting a loss of income style insurance to protect income streams in the event of disaster, are these possible?

Reply: 1.1.1.1.1.1.2.1.1.1.1 From: Jeremy Laws Rixter, The only problem I have that is deep rooted is with an idiot in Florida who owes me $50k and a council that won't let me have a boatshed. I don't think anyone here can claim responsibility for any of these issues! I can cope with anything...

Reply: 1.1.1.1.1.1.2.1.1 From: Jeremy Laws I think you should look upon 6 month relationships more along the lines of Mortgage Insurance, not Scrooge-like. But Michele to be wiped out at 35 financially and then be back in a reasonable state (how old are you now? 68?) 33 years later is not...

Reply: 1.1.1.1.1.1.2 From: Jeremy Laws 1) The law does take Pre Nups into account. It has only recently happened. 2) Off shore assets help (Lance Spicer is NOT the grail - his philosophy is based on not telling anyone anything, and hoping they don't find out. Problem is Family law can take...

Reply: 1.1.1 From: Jeremy Laws BTW anon, I don't want to scare you but 50% loss of assets is a BEST case scenario in almost every case. The worst I know of was 140% loss of assets. Average in my industry is 80-90%

Reply: 1.1 From: Jeremy Laws Crap Rixter! Anon is asking a very good question, and I would like to know the answer also. Unfortunately the best suggestion I have had so far is to ask said creature to marry you. Once engaged you can ask them to sign a prenup which limits the losses. This is...