Search results

Yes, the same Iraq that Bush junior--the genius luminary of the free world; the upstanding leader of the Republicans in the US, the last bastion of free enterprise--said had weapons of mass destruction. Wategos is right: extremist Right Wing garbage from the US.

When I say 'go in' I mean very selectively target their strongholds, their supply chains, the source of their income streams and their hide outs. 'Go in' includes helping the local army and the freedom fighters. Let's not forget that ISIL are not fighting on behalf Muslims; they are killing...

Iranians are not Arabs; they are Persian. If the radicals were the superpower and the western democracies were weak, they wouldn't bother with a 'pretext' or an excuse to come in and force us to convert. If the Middle East were the superpower and the West were weak, and the West perpetrated...

ha ha Angel, you're not a grumpy old cow at all. I think the US waited to so long before going in to fight ISIL because they recognised that ISIL was taunting them. ISIL wanted to draw the US into the fight, so that again the US could be the 'bad boys' and ISIL could then be seen to be fighting...

If Australia were getting bombed continuously by an enemy who did not believe that Australians even had a right to a homeland (ie Australia), would we sit by and do nothing? I don't think so.

Shanghai, we should never have gone into Iraq in the first place. But I believe that all the leaders--Bush, Howard and the British--were fully aware that there were no 'weapons of mass destruction'. I agree with you: once you go in their to kill one dictator, you remove the natural balance...