Search results

Again Sim, no the figures still don't work. If he bought a normal house 1km back from the Esplanade he could have paid $290k, but that sort of house certainly wouldn't be worth $950k now - he's admitted as much anyway, under the guise of 'privacy' which clearly gets the legals worried. Anyway...

I only reacted that way Sim because it was (or wasn't :rolleyes:) an obvious lie that took about 2 mins to prove wrong. Believe me I'm used to all the 'new' posters coming around and claiming this and that, and don't believe or listen to a lot of it. However that's only my opinion. If something...

Ummmm yes Sim, it does. Considering A) No house sold for that price B) No house sold for even $100k within that claimed price. How much more conclusive would you like me to get, would a print out of every house on that street for 2yrs either side of his claim suffice? Anyway, I'll leave it at...

Spot on TC. According to the logic above, I can proclaim to all and sundry I personally hold in my own name 20M shares in Westfield Corporation. Now if someone checked the Top20 list for WDC and saw that there was no Steve with 20M shares, and points this out it's not 'on topic.' More to the...

Thanks for splitting the posts Sim. Perhaps you could answer the question I posed? How is pointing out that the poster was lying about the above line off topic? Why does it warrant a deletion? Why is the original lie allowed to remain?

{Note - these posts were split from this thread: http://www.somersoft.com/forums/showthread.php?t=55165 - Sim'} Excuse me Sim, but how is illustrating that a poster is blatantly lying off topic? He stated he bought a house which was a flat out lie, yet this is now wiped from SS so as far as...