Search results

Hi PNS Agree - this thread is great. We are in an almost identical (down to the borrowing dollar) situation. In the SMSF - I think it is critical to be conservative as (1) this is the intent and (2) It is hard (whilst not impossible) to inject liquidity into the SMSF if required...

My model assumes additional lending into the SMSF from another party which can lift the effective LVR. i.e. from an individual such as myself. (and I am also planning on having a significant buffer for liquidity purposes)

The sums (help appreciated) I am running the sums and obviously it is slightly different when you don't have an income to negatively gear against. For those who know does this make sense? For the purposes of simplicity, assuming nil other income in the fund. Year 1 Year 2 Rent 20800...

Leveraging up current super balance to provide a better retirement income 30 years from today in complete understanding that it is a risky regulatory environment but the funds are already in this environment. My view..