Search results

Because the purchaser has no tenancy agreement directly with the tenants. And the purchaser now has legal title over the property. The tenants have a tenancy agreement with the outgoing vendor - who now does not own the property. The only thing binding the tenant and purchaser together is...

I can only say for WA for sure (although I imagine its similar in all states). But it almost certainly would not be grounds for rescission. Its definitely a breach that can be dealt with by damages only. The loser in the situation is really the tenant as well - the new owner does not owe any...

Ok tenancy lawyer weighing in here. I'm fairly sure I know the legalities in this situation. First thing to look at his the sale contract. It shouldn't say vacant possession is granted, because clearly it wasn't. There's two scenarios depending on what it says. 1. Vacant possession. Vendor...