Search results

Reply: 1.1.2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 From: Tony Dixon >Tony, have you been to Dale's >Tax Battles seminar ? I've made an 'expression of interest' for Dale's Perth seminar. Hopefully he'll make it over here. >Dale also has a "manual" out >which is quite comprehensive >and well worth the...

Reply: 1.1.2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 From: Tony Dixon Hi Sim, You are correct about my confusion. I was thinking that a trust was simply another entity like a company, just playing by different rules. But it seems to be fundamentally different. Time for me to do some more reading! Thanks...

Reply: 1.1.2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 From: Tony Dixon Hi Dale, >You must have misunderstood >something that I said. I >would not suggest that your >trust not own anything . . . I probably have misunderstood something. There was a discussion a few months ago about which entity should own IPs -...

Reply: 1.1.2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 From: Tony Dixon I have a few more questions regarding trusts. A corporate trustee owning the IPs is the preferred structure for asset protection. Should the IPs be split across multiple companies, each owning, say 2-4 each? Each controlled by the same trust? And...