Search results

I think it’s probably a bit of a semantic argument. Obviously the intent of obtaining a torrent file is to acquire the content it addresses. Assumedly in Monty’s case the content was illegally accessed.

The legal issue is not related to the file format or transfer mechanism. MP3, DIVX and ISO are all perfectly legal formats and torrents are a perfectly legal transfer mechanism. The issue arises when you download or redistribute content you are not legally entitled to. It's legally the digital...

In terms of legal sites, have you checked out what's available through iTunes?