Search results

  1. westminster

    WA to potentially remove paprtment developemt provisions from R30/R34 zones

    In that I would say those brownfield are areas large enough to require a DAP/Structure Plan. For example Princeton Estate, Stirling is probably brownfield. But again all over it says medium density single houses, so for now if you want to use the land will need to be survey strata'd first...
  2. westminster

    WA to potentially remove paprtment developemt provisions from R30/R34 zones

    It's only for single houses not grouped dwellings or multis
  3. westminster

    WA to potentially remove paprtment developemt provisions from R30/R34 zones

    7 months - love how quick the wheels of change go ;). In my case it's a blessing as I don't want my loophole closed yet.
  4. westminster

    WA to potentially remove paprtment developemt provisions from R30/R34 zones

    Thanks for the update. I have one project potentially affected (changing of wording of substantial to majority in Multis) and I'm hoping it gets through before the change if the outcome goes that way. Fingers crossed.
  5. westminster

    WA to potentially remove paprtment developemt provisions from R30/R34 zones

    Do Canning allow multis on R30? I'm trying to read their TPS and it's archaic
  6. westminster

    WA to potentially remove paprtment developemt provisions from R30/R34 zones

    I mean that if I wanted to put multis on R40 that I will just avoid buying in Stirling.
  7. westminster

    WA to potentially remove paprtment developemt provisions from R30/R34 zones

    As long as they don't stretch their little tentacles onto R40 it should be ok as far as I'm concerned. I know Stirling have their tentacles onto their R40 but that is workable to avoid.
  8. westminster

    WA to potentially remove paprtment developemt provisions from R30/R34 zones

    And changed the units from sqm sizes to bedroom sizes for parking. Glad I'm getting all mine in before this ***** hits the fan
Back
Top