I don't care if it is because of 'traditional' gender roles - it is still patronising. DH would be just as PO if they treated him like an idiot or ignored him. I think that it isn't wrong to be able to expect people to treat BOTH members of a couple as thinking contibuting human beings, certainly at least until they have proven otherwise.
Maybe I am unusual - I don't know - All the women I associate with are intelligent people (or at least reasonably so), regardless as to whether they are SAHM's or hold full time jobs, who are able to understand finances, etc - at least to a basic degree. Those in relationships aren't wall flowers, who choose to leave those matters solely to their partners - even those who may sometimes appear defferential or quiet to the general public.
I really think noone should ever underestimate a woman's influence.
Personally I am always surprised (and then annoyed) when I encounter such attitudes, because I am not even close to what may be decribed as 'quiet' or a 'wallflower'. Although I have heard myself described as blunt and intimidating.
Maybe I am unusual - I don't know - All the women I associate with are intelligent people (or at least reasonably so), regardless as to whether they are SAHM's or hold full time jobs, who are able to understand finances, etc - at least to a basic degree. Those in relationships aren't wall flowers, who choose to leave those matters solely to their partners - even those who may sometimes appear defferential or quiet to the general public.
I really think noone should ever underestimate a woman's influence.
Personally I am always surprised (and then annoyed) when I encounter such attitudes, because I am not even close to what may be decribed as 'quiet' or a 'wallflower'. Although I have heard myself described as blunt and intimidating.