Your fears are valid, I have been to europe many times and saw how my auntie (who has never worked in her life and has always drawn a small pension) took the tenants to court and won every time, forcing the tenant to raise the tenant no more than inflation. She had a lease for about 5 years and it was her right to extend it at the current agreed terms, no renegotiation.
I love my auntie and I saw her plight, but I also saw it as unfair to the tenant, something she nor any of my family could understand, they just felt it was inhumane and uncompassionate to charge her the going rate because of her situation.
Rent control is quite common in many parts of the world. Especially New York. But investors there know the rules and choose to invest on that basis. What you are buying is really an income stream pegged to inflation, not a property. Therefore those properties are almost always positively geared and there is much lower potential upside.
Society needs to provide accommodation to those who can't afford it in a competitive market place. This is probably as important as free health care and education.
Buying houses tenanted by people with no money, to kick them out and replace them with people with slightly more money, isn't really the most productive investment.
However the idea of a landlords association is good. It could hold tenant history reports, mostly red-flags of those who have previously trashed a place. Knowing there would be a semi-public record of your tenancy behavior may encourage better behavior (e.g. paying rent, not setting fire to carpet).