I think some of the arguments older generations have is that it was actually harder to purchase a home. You needed 20% deposit (no 95% with LMI), no government grants, 17% interest rates at one point, often single income with Mum at home, plus they were out the door when they were 18-22 years old?
Please show me one major lender (non mezz) that will lend 95% to first home buyers post financial crisis ? I'd like to see that. My fiancee and I needed a 20% deposit just like previous generations, except as I said, for us it's 20% of a far higher capital value for a whole lot less property!
I also don't see the Government grant as any real assistance to be honest. As I said, because prices are now at 7-10x household income, the stamp duty (being percentage based) hits Gen Y more than twice as hard as previous generations. So after the grant, the stamp duty we pay went from "absolutely ridiculous" to just "hugely taxing" - aren't we a spoiled generation?
Fact:
Yes, I lived through the dreaded 17% mortgage rates, though the highest I paid was 16% (on an IP).
Rates at 17% would have been excruciating for certain. You should consider yourself lucky that:
a) That sort of dire economic enviornment is abnormal and was not sustained for a long period of time.
b) Because housing was affordable for you in the first place, you did not default. I can assure you that not even the most disciplined, robust savers in my "lazy" generation could sustain that sort of economic environment repeated, because housing is so much more unaffordable for us.
The "inner suburbs" you say your parents live in were the "outer suburbs" at that time.
I don't care how they were viewed at that time. I only care about proximity to the CBD and access to public transport as a measurement.
Your generation enjoyed 5-15 km radius living for much, much less than what it costs today. I don't care that you considered that to be "outer" at that time.
Our first VCR, a basic model, cost us $1,200. Yes, that is around 25-30 years ago so in today's values would be far higher. Other white goods were priced far higher than today's prices. We started our with a second hand fridge and a hired TV. In 1972 we paid $250 for a new Hoover twin tub washing machine.
And no cheap imports. Clothing was expensive - I would put a new dress on lay-by and pay it off over 5-6 weeks.
I don't know why this has become a debate about consumer products, but I will ask you this:
What did petrol cost you when you drove your first car? alot less than it costs me each week. What did chewing gum cost when you were growing up? Alot less than it costs me each week ($3.50 a pack? ouch!)
What did meat, milk, groceries and the like cost you growing up?
Heck, what did tobacco and alcohol cost you in your 20's? alot less than it costs now with all the extra tax (I don't drink or smoke.. part of the reason I could buy a property)
So please don't whinge that we had it easier.
We didn't.
So, as the saying goes, take a teaspoon of cement and harden up.
I am responding to the endless stereotyping of my generation as impatient, undisciplined, lazy sods who "have it easy". That, is total bollocks for all of the reasons I mentioned.
Dan C hit the nail on the head.