This is an interesting read...
http://capitalismmagazine.com/2013/12/low-income-english-whites-american-ghetto-blacks-common/
http://capitalismmagazine.com/2013/12/low-income-english-whites-american-ghetto-blacks-common/
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is an interesting read...
http://capitalismmagazine.com/2013/12/low-income-english-whites-american-ghetto-blacks-common/
I wouldn't call it thriving. A lot of those foreign workera have close to zero rights and are treated terribly. There is also very little integration of many of these groups with locals.
I wouldn't call it thriving. A lot of those foreign workera have close to zero rights and are treated terribly. There is also very little integration of many of these groups with locals.
If you are a local then yes you are thriving. They have access to the best real estate and tax advantages and all sorts of perks.
As to the migrants, history shows that you will always have those that suffer and those that do well. Our own history is proof of that.
Yeah... there's working in lower paying jobs such as labouring etc, then there is being essentially slave labour and indentured servitude.
If you think the moral trade off of slave labour in exchange for a few people at the top getting wealthy, that is a sad state of affairs.
Are you aware that there are people in Sydney being paid $16 an hour on contracts with no superannuation, leave or other benefits. That amount would be a dream to some undertaking their apprenticeships on much less.
These are all acceptable forms of what you defined as "indentured servitude".
For the record, I am not of the belief that there should be different levels of society but unfortunately that is life.
Mmmmm. I'm not sure that you have convinced me that being an apprentice in Sydney is just like having your passport confiscated and being beaten and or sexually abused by your 'employers' for years on end in the UAE.
If you want to copy a UAE practise that has made them fabulously wealthy and developed, then re-nationalise mining and put the billions generated into health, education and infrastructure. Or at least have a decent mining tax.
Can you provide the proof?
You are stating items that can occur anywhere. Recently a Sydney Madam was jailed for sex slaves. Does that make Australia an appalling country and should you feel ashamed that you did not stop it?
At the end of the day, there will always be winners and losers in an economy with some doing better than others.
What you are referring to are criminal activities not general practise.
Having spent time in UAE I can understand that you would feel uncomfortable if your skin ws brown as many of the lower paid jobs are undertaken by those races.
Being a different colour, I was also uncomfortable with the high level of service office and amount of "assistance" as having lived in Australia for so long at my income level it is not the norm.
We will have to agree to disagree.
Australian protester beats deportation by claiming australia is unsafe for his Indian wife and child due to racism, and will remain in Britain
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-12-10/boat-race-protester-allowed-to-stay-in-britain/5145644
My wife (Mexican mixed race, strongly indigenous) felt more discriminated against (in small ways mostly, but in a huge way with British immigration) in two years in England than in 22 years in Australia.
There have been a lot of race riots in England.
So I think his views of the safety of Australians is based much more on perception than fact. The English are probably happy to go along with such perception.
Sorry, but you cannot make the link between illegal activities in one country that are investigated and those responsible charged, and state sanctioned near slavery.
The conditions of non-European workers in the ME is pretty appalling. It's a basic statement of fact. If you are happy getting money off the back of near slave labour, then we just have a different moral code.
This article is part of a series on the politics and government of the United Arab Emirates Constitution[show]Constitution of 1971 Human rights Federal Supreme Council Federal Supreme Council Current Members Presidential monarchy President Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan Government
Human rights are legally protected by the Constitution of the United Arab Emirates, which confers equality, liberty, rule of law, presumption of innocence in legal procedures, inviolability of the home, freedom of movement, freedom of opinion and speech, freedom of communication, freedom of religion, freedom of council and association, freedom of occupation, freedom to be elected to office and others onto all citizens, within the limit of the law.The UAE is held to be one of the most liberal countries in the Middle East, particularly when compared to its neighbor, Saudi Arabia. The UAE has one of the strongest human rights records in the region, a fact recognised in November 2012 when the UAE was elected to the UN Human Rights Council for a three-year term.