Hi Dave,
Read this thread:
http://www.somersoft.com/forums/showthread.php?t=38744
Then do the sums. Here's a hypothetical example:
Buy $200K house (in need of reno)
Spend $20K on reno (keep it at 10% or less than the purchase price)
New val = $240K ( you get $2 back in val for each $1 you spend, if you do it right and maybe more)
Profit of $20K is eaten away ENTIRELY by - Stamp duty, 3 months holding costs to buy, reno, sell, REA comms, etc) and that is if it all goes to plan....which renos often don't.
Best option is to buy, reno, refinance the created equity out and hold forever.
Refinancing at least gets you 80% of your $20K back in cash (less some holding costs) and repeat process again and again.....not tax, no commish.
Even people like Michael Yardney say they have not sold any of their developments for a very long time - it is just too expensive.
The kind of buy, reno and sell thing to make money only happens in a part of the cycle where there is upward movement on prices which we saw in 2003 > 2005 and you saw in MEL a little bit last year as well. The sums still work as per the example above but while you are doing the reno the market is still moving upwards and so you make money doing it (you think it was your fantastic reno but it was the market too).
IMHO this is not the part of the cycle that this strategy works well. In this part of the cycle you make money by finding distressed vendors, making low ball offers, taking up a few who say yes and then holding till the market improves in a couple of years - then refinance the equity out of it and off you go again.
Just my 2c.
Aimjoy