Perhaps I was misunderstood, I didn't think you suggested it I just gave an example that for everyone it's different it's their choice. So I am not condeming if someone wants a flash car. But for our family it's bad debt if it's bought with debt.
So if people want cars, castles, planes, anything they dream off, I am not judging, but I tell our kids that they can have it if it's paid for by an income generating asset, that's all.
And what's wrong with delayed gratification, I actually would be an advocate of that, isn't it up to the individual though?
At first we owned a $6K car, now we have 4, we made our sandwiches for many years to work, now eat out every week, and so on and on an on (I am not boasting here - but I believe there's something for something - give and take).
I think we all deserve the things we want but we must be wise enough to get them when we can afford them.
I don't see how people perceive delayed gratification, but let's say you wish to have the bike you now have, and let's assume you do not have the money for it (or even if you do have the money).
You see I would tell my kids, save up some money (or use the money you have), invest and/or borrow into an asset, delaying the purchase, and when the asset generates income into your pocket, then go and buy it with the income generated, while keeping the asset.
It's not that you really deny yourself everything and live below your means, but rather put off the other wants which may distract you from reaching the things you really want (the end goal - your bike).
I hope this makes sense.....