The market is very segmented and to talk about Melbourne's median or growth rate is meaningless.
Heavily Disagree;
If you have the median performance of every suburb in melbourne then its straightforward to produce the Melbourne Median, we can judge the cities performance relative to Perth or Brisbane with this. True inner might be going nuts, middle might be just typical growth and outer melbourne might be flat, but the melbourne median encompasses all these in one hit. A melbourne median of 20% growth in 1 year tells me alot compared to a median growth of 2%, whilst the distribution of that is another story
The median is an excellent statistic for judging market position and relative buoyancy.
Whilst you need to be careful not to just blindly believe a 3month or quarter median results. The YOY (year on year) median figures start to rule out any short term peaks and troughs,
Indeed any particular suburbs with small turnover of sales is highlighted as such and should only be taken with a pinch of salt.
Its the easiest and most direct mechanism by which we can judge CG is the median price.
Long term statistics are also valid, victorian valuer general publication, over the last 10-15 years.
Its true its not an indication or reflection of every property sold in that suburb, but is a good yardstick for judging what the average is
I do agree that the figures are always out of date but thats the nature of the beast, suffice to say my prediction for the next quarter is more of the same with middle and outer melbourne picking up somewhat.