Ok here's the story. Our 2yr old house was rented to a couple of students. They vacated last week and when we went through after they'd left we found that in bedrooms 1 and 2 there were a 1.5m x 1m square patch of carpet that looks like it has been sewn back on. Tenants claim they burnt the carpets with a hairdryer (i suspect they may have been cooking or something in there) so they supposedly had a carpet repair guy come out and repair the carpet (clearly a job they did themselves). What they've done is cut out a large chunk of carpet, gone and bought a new matching piece of carpet and sewn it back. Looks dodgy as and first thing you notice when you see the bedroom.
Had a carpet repairer look at it and He advises that its beyond repair and needs to be replaced. PM advises that we can only charge Tenants a portion of the cost to repair worked out by the square meter of damaged carpet in relation to the area of the whole room.
To me that sounds ridiculous because why exactly are we going to be out of pocket for something that the Tenants damaged?! Doesn't sound right to Me. Have rung OCBA but they just told us it depends on age of carpets (only 2yr old house), state of carpets at beginning of tenancy (good as new) etc. OCBA said to put in the claim with the Tenants and if they object then the case goes to the Tribunal.
Anyone been in the unfortunate situation of being through something similar and what was the outcome?
Any thoughts would be great!
p.s. have advised PM to tell Tenants we will be claiming cost of replacing carpets but she has not gotten back to me...
Had a carpet repairer look at it and He advises that its beyond repair and needs to be replaced. PM advises that we can only charge Tenants a portion of the cost to repair worked out by the square meter of damaged carpet in relation to the area of the whole room.
To me that sounds ridiculous because why exactly are we going to be out of pocket for something that the Tenants damaged?! Doesn't sound right to Me. Have rung OCBA but they just told us it depends on age of carpets (only 2yr old house), state of carpets at beginning of tenancy (good as new) etc. OCBA said to put in the claim with the Tenants and if they object then the case goes to the Tribunal.
Anyone been in the unfortunate situation of being through something similar and what was the outcome?
Any thoughts would be great!
p.s. have advised PM to tell Tenants we will be claiming cost of replacing carpets but she has not gotten back to me...