Hi all,
Longtime lurker, first-time poster. Any chance you guys and girls could help me out?
Mt wife and I are looking to get into the investment game after a couple years wondering if we can make it happen.
Our own home in Perth has a mortgage of 120k left to go, with about 380k equity. We earn about 160k gross income between us, most of which comes from me.
We're looking at buying an IP to hold for quite some time, to finish off our mortage and then perhaps use the equity to add other IP's after that.
Money wise, we're looking at $350-500k homes (not apartments), either building, or the less than 2 years old variety for full depreciation tax reductions at the moment.
The tax reduction c/o negative gearing looks attractive, however positive gearing looks attractive too. I'm not sure which is better?!?!
But we also want no risk > a low vacancy rate is the most important thing, as money wise we don't have a whole lot of wriggle room, so selling a house in an area with poor resale, and taking a much reduced price due to urgency, would hurt us if the **** hit the fan.
So what do you think is the wise move to make?
Is aiming for a positive or negative geared property the better move?
I've read that positive geared properties can be more risky than negative geared, is this true?
One area we're looking at is Mackay > we have people over there we know, but unfortunately they're not looking to be a long-term tenant for us. But all the same, is the area a good one to look at?
Thank you all.
Longtime lurker, first-time poster. Any chance you guys and girls could help me out?
Mt wife and I are looking to get into the investment game after a couple years wondering if we can make it happen.
Our own home in Perth has a mortgage of 120k left to go, with about 380k equity. We earn about 160k gross income between us, most of which comes from me.
We're looking at buying an IP to hold for quite some time, to finish off our mortage and then perhaps use the equity to add other IP's after that.
Money wise, we're looking at $350-500k homes (not apartments), either building, or the less than 2 years old variety for full depreciation tax reductions at the moment.
The tax reduction c/o negative gearing looks attractive, however positive gearing looks attractive too. I'm not sure which is better?!?!
But we also want no risk > a low vacancy rate is the most important thing, as money wise we don't have a whole lot of wriggle room, so selling a house in an area with poor resale, and taking a much reduced price due to urgency, would hurt us if the **** hit the fan.
So what do you think is the wise move to make?
Is aiming for a positive or negative geared property the better move?
I've read that positive geared properties can be more risky than negative geared, is this true?
One area we're looking at is Mackay > we have people over there we know, but unfortunately they're not looking to be a long-term tenant for us. But all the same, is the area a good one to look at?
Thank you all.