I think you'll find that properties that sit for a longer time in Frangers right now - especially in this pricepoint - it's becuase they are most likely to be:
1. Too expensive
2. Not well positioned
3. Cr@p house
4. All of the above.
The second house for example, is an older house with no wow factors - looks like the Vendors are trying to cash in on the land size a bit.
There was a 2x1 unit sold in our block a few weeks ago for $207k; it sat there for quite a few weeks before selling. I thought it'd go within a week.
I asked the agent what had happened there - she said it was the smallest in the complex, hadn't been renoed all that much, etc.
I would not be surpised if they were all of the above. Need to work on my skill of picking value in individual properties.
207k for a unit seems expensive when you add 20-30k and you can get an ok 3bdrm house on a decent sized block.
- Better area then the first but still a little rough, nice sized block too. Any idea what it is rented at? That may be your answer.
- Don't know that area that well.
As far as properties "under offer/contract", I've seen a few times in the last couple of months where the sticker is put on the board, stays there for a month or so and then is removed. It might be a marketing ploy or it may just mean a condition fell through and the agent is a little slack to remove it. Problem is that you are relying on the agent to tell you the truth.
I agree with you. Knowing the rent a place is getting will give you a much better idea of its value. I'd be calling the agents asking once the buying time is closer.
3rd one is just a block of land isn't it?
The listing is confusing but if you look at it carefully, it say at the bottom 3b edrooms and one bathroom. So a decent slab of land with a box on it as player would say.
BTW, as far as value (seeing you asked):
First property seems good value - depending what it sold for. Maybe why it's under offer.
2nd & 3rd properties are pitched at investors, who are pretty thin on the ground at the moment. Whereas 18 mths ago a vendor could ask for a higher price based on subdivision potential; this is not necessarily the case at the moment. The 2nd property is in Frankston heights, which I consider one of the best parts of Frankston. However, it's on the main road for the area so wouldn't be my choice for a road to live on. I imagine that the block would be subdividable but it will only sell to a very limited market. (I'd be surprised if owner-occs wouldn't be interested in it).
Property 3, if only a block of land, is a very limited market as the price is inflated because of the development potential. Just around the corner is this good reno prospect:
http://www.realestate.com.au/cgi-bi...r=&cc=&c=49096274&s=vic&snf=rbs&tm=1244076684
Also will not appeal to owner-occs, probably. There has been a lot of FHB activity but I've been told that they don't want a reno project. Good thing with this house is that you'll always have an advantage with a 4 bedder in the rental market. Smaller block but from the map looks a decent size despite absolutely woeful pics that make the place look like it's on no land at all. If you are looking mainly for a block with development potential you'd have to check the size of this. But advantage is if you want to wait for a definite market upswing before developing down the track, something like this is perfect. Spend about $20k and you'll get a good return in the meantime.
Your idea for getting a property like that one with reno potential is good. Rent it out, when convenient renovate (my case pay some one to do it) and increase value. I've been following Player/Michael's school of thought and ideally would like to get a place like this on a block at least 600m in size.