Thanks JacM
I understand the difference between the two.. But the reasoning is what I have trouble with.
I consider the money I have paid back.. to be.. well.. exactly that, money that I have paid back and is no longer mine, so i never re-draw and dont plan to.
I suppose what Im trying to get at is..
Is it in my best intrest to:
A) Continue as I am. Paying extra repayments towards the P&I loan, whilst throwing whatever left over I have into my offset account.
B) Changing the loan to Interest only and pump all my savings into the offset account... and try to live with the fact that the principle amount isnt lowering, which bugs me?
I really should buy some reading material regarding all this.. lol.
What you are doing is not wrong, but think of this.
You have a $150,000 loan and $150,000 cash.
1. You park the $150k in the offset = No interest
2. You deposit the $150k into the loan = No interest
After 12 months you decide to move but keep the current owner occupied property and rent it out.
Under scenario 1, you take your $150,000 with you to the new property and park in the offset.
under 2 above you would have to redraw $150,000 from the loan. The purpose of this new withdrawal is for an owner occupied home so the interest would not be deductible.
Scenario 1 would mean you have $150,000 x 5% less interest on your PPOR loan.
Scenario 2 would mean you have $150,000 x 5% more interest on your PPOR loan and $150,000 x 5% less on the IP loan.
$150k x 5% = $3750.
Potential tax savings would be about $1600 pa.
Imagine this on bigger numbers and over 30 years of compounding.