High Yielding Shares Again

Thanks for the link,quote,

But as long as the business environment continues to improve there is a lot of potential regardless of where the market mood swings may go in 30 days or 30 years.
 
For my DCA strategy to be successful the most important thing to do is to discount all the daily noise and keep buying monthly (it's cheaper now, why would I stop?) and stick with it.

Like I said I'll let you know how it goes after 10 years of DCA.
 
Current yield on Big 4 on past 2 dividends at today's pricing:

NAB: 6.23%
WBC: 5.95%
ANZ: 5.83%
CBA: 5.20%

These are net. Include franking credit and you're up between 7.43% - 8.9%


pinkboy
 
Current yield on Big 4 on past 2 dividends at today's pricing:

NAB: 6.23%
WBC: 5.95%
ANZ: 5.83%
CBA: 5.20%

These are net. Include franking credit and you're up between 7.43% - 8.9%


pinkboy

Given recent capital raisings it looks like these dividends are not sustainable. The payout ratios have been too high as investors have been chasing yield. Hence the expectation that these dividends will drop.

Nevertheless, there are likely to be worse investments out there!
 
Buffett only 'dollar averages'
where it makes sense to do so.

That doesn't mean 'ohw the market is down 10% better start dollar averaging'.

Buffet would have an idea on what the actual 'value' is against the current shareprice.

So for those out there just spouting 'buy the dips', do you really know what the value is first.

Without knowing the value, how can you know whether its time to dollar average.



In Basic English if an onion is worth $5. It was trading for $10. Its now selling for $7. Is it now of value??????


When looking at broad measures such as the ASX200, high yielding funds etc.
Your job is more complicated. You need to calculate a weighted mean of value.

Anyway, so many new commers to this forum. all with their ideas.

IV will be taking a back seat.
 
So how do you value your stock? pick any stock from the asx as an example and enlighten us how you value its share price?


Buffett only 'dollar averages'
where it makes sense to do so.

That doesn't mean 'ohw the market is down 10% better start dollar averaging'.

Buffet would have an idea on what the actual 'value' is against the current shareprice.

So for those out there just spouting 'buy the dips', do you really know what the value is first.

Without knowing the value, how can you know whether its time to dollar average.



In Basic English if an onion is worth $5. It was trading for $10. Its now selling for $7. Is it now of value??????


When looking at broad measures such as the ASX200, high yielding funds etc.
Your job is more complicated. You need to calculate a weighted mean of value.

Anyway, so many new commers to this forum. all with their ideas.

IV will be taking a back seat.
 
Buffett only 'dollar averages'
where it makes sense to do so.

That doesn't mean 'ohw the market is down 10% better start dollar averaging'.

Buffet would have an idea on what the actual 'value' is against the current shareprice.

So for those out there just spouting 'buy the dips', do you really know what the value is first.

Without knowing the value, how can you know whether its time to dollar average.



In Basic English if an onion is worth $5. It was trading for $10. Its now selling for $7. Is it now of value??????


When looking at broad measures such as the ASX200, high yielding funds etc.
Your job is more complicated. You need to calculate a weighted mean of value.

Anyway, so many new commers to this forum. all with their ideas.

IV will be taking a back seat.

You're confusing 'averaging down' with 'dollar cost averaging'.

'Dollar cost averaging' is purchasing at regular intervals with regular amounts no matter price movement up or down. This is an accumulation strategy, and the dividends are all reinvested to accumulate as much of the stock/equity/fund over time. Value is not a factor in this strategy as the value is what the market is prepared to buy/sell at each interval triggered.

'Averaging down' is purchasing more of the stock to lower the overall purchase price. Much like continuing to catch a falling knife (which you demonstrate in this thread IV with the likes of NWH, MCS etc).

Confusing the 2 makes your argument above flawed and not easily followed and has nothing to do with 'High Yielding Shares'.


pinkboy
 
Last edited:
Back
Top