IV and Oracle, the issue I have with value investing is that you are making decisions based on historical data, and are exposed to the uncertainty and instability associated with macro events
.
Most of the analysis with historical data, is to get a 'feel' for the company, how strong are its margins over time, how consistent are profits, hows its ROE, has it expanded through organic growth or acquisition growth. etc etc
This gives you a 'guestimate' of the future ability of the company. But the stronger the features above the higher the probability that the company will continue into the future.
So the first stage is 'stability' of the company. The next stage is price.
If one doesnt over pay for a share, then over the long term, the share price is less at risk from an uncertain future environment, because more uncertainty is built into the price.
IMO, we have entered a period when the macro climate is likely to influence stock price more than usual. THerefore, I think an astute value investor would be wise to take into consideration company AND macro data
.
I mentioned above that i do take macro data into account, but the focus is on the company specific share. I cant fine tune macro data into company specific valuations, its impossible.
So generally i am just looking at broad strokes in macro data. Are the 'general' conditions positive or negative with relation to share prices. I look at the future economic indicators and are they 'broadly' positive/negative.
If I was seeking value in a company, I would definitely want to know how if its market would expand or contract, in addition to whether it could expand its market share.
If i was running a concentrated portfolio i would have to pay closer attention to this, but i dont i run a 'loose' porfolio with a number of stocks that have a reasonable degree of achieving satisfactory returns. Stage one (stock selection) is important for your point here as a form of insurance. Remember i am playing an 'odds' game here, some will work out some wont, but its the net odds that concern me.
Do you guys factor in stuff like retail sales, interest rates, unemployment in analysing/confirming a company's future revenue forecasts?
Yes but only in 'broad strokes':
retail sales: are they positive/negative, whats the overall trend. Specific details will not necessarily correlate with stock specific numbers.
Interest rates: are they up/down stable, does it appear that the influence is being valued in stocks already?
Unemployment: general trend.
The trouble is WW i think you like to create 'certainty', and in the stock market you dont get certainty. When general conditions are 'certain' its often the most dangerous time.