Ok,
so i like to think we have quite a decent level of intelligence on these forums, and as such I got to wondering if people could come up with a way to spend the governments $42b other than what it is currently being spent on.
For me, I think a massive building like the dams that were built in the US in the great depression would be the best bet, but being 2009 and not 1933 my preference would be to a massive solar power plant or string of plants.
What if we could use the $42b to create a string of solar power plants?
Here is an interesting article on the amount of land needed to produce solar power to fuel the world's needs:
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/04/solar-thermal-power-photos-how-much-world-europe-germany.php
And here is a plant using older technology which cost $100m:
http://www.metaefficient.com/news/north-americas-largest-solar-electric-plant-in-switched-on.html
Using the figures from the second link at $100m to power ~4,000 people the plants could generate a minimum amount of power to fully power 1.68million people, or 30% of the power to 5.6million people.
Also taking into account where the job cuts have been felt - mining and finance, and this would allow these people to be employed in a massive capital works program. Not to mention the need for the raw materials would increase helping the mining sector out.
Anyway, that is my thought, but how would you spend the governments $42b given the chance?
Looking forward to the replies!
Cheers
Ben
so i like to think we have quite a decent level of intelligence on these forums, and as such I got to wondering if people could come up with a way to spend the governments $42b other than what it is currently being spent on.
For me, I think a massive building like the dams that were built in the US in the great depression would be the best bet, but being 2009 and not 1933 my preference would be to a massive solar power plant or string of plants.
What if we could use the $42b to create a string of solar power plants?
Here is an interesting article on the amount of land needed to produce solar power to fuel the world's needs:
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/04/solar-thermal-power-photos-how-much-world-europe-germany.php
And here is a plant using older technology which cost $100m:
http://www.metaefficient.com/news/north-americas-largest-solar-electric-plant-in-switched-on.html
Using the figures from the second link at $100m to power ~4,000 people the plants could generate a minimum amount of power to fully power 1.68million people, or 30% of the power to 5.6million people.
Also taking into account where the job cuts have been felt - mining and finance, and this would allow these people to be employed in a massive capital works program. Not to mention the need for the raw materials would increase helping the mining sector out.
Anyway, that is my thought, but how would you spend the governments $42b given the chance?
Looking forward to the replies!
Cheers
Ben