I'm wondering if Coles indeed knows (of course they do ) that without them as a major tenant, the centre itself will likely turn into a white elephant, and hence they can drive the prices down to suit themselves.
Is that pretty much the case with your centre? If you lose Coles as a major tenant, is there a high risk of the place becoming a white elephant?
Hi Wylie,
No, that is not the case with us. Our major Tenant, (who is a local WA supermarket operator) takes up 60% of the floor space, and the rent they pay alone covers the entire mortgage plus all of the council rates and water rates. This relieves all of the financial pressures of owning the asset.
If the entire centre was completely empty except the supermarket, we'd be fine and dandy. As it is, there are another 13 shops besides the supermarket, 9 of which are in there making money and paying us rent. We have 4 smaller shops empty right now, and Coles are thinking of taking one of them (as a liquor store).....so they have not quite the leverage that you are talking about.
Once all filled, along with the 3 or 4 ATMs we own, the rent they pay combined is far greater than the supermarket, so she's a bit of a gravy train at present, and it'll be moreso when it's full. We are under no pressure whatsoever to agree with their terms, and with Coles being forced to operate under our liquor licence, we have the upper hand when it comes to negotiating terms fortunately.