Letter to employees - This IS the way it is

To All My Valued Employees,


There have been some rumblings around the office about the future of this company, and more specifically, your job. As you know, the economy has changed for the worse and presents many challenges. However, the good news is this: The economy doesn't pose a threat to your job What does threaten your job; however, is the changing political landscape in this country.


However, let me tell you some little tidbits of fact which might help you decide what is in your best interests.


First, while it is easy to spew rhetoric that casts employers against employees, you have to understand that for every business owner there is a back story. This back story is often neglected and overshadowed by what you see and hear. Sure, you see me park my Subaru Outback outside. You've seen my big home at last year's Christmas party. I'm sure all these flashy icons of luxury conjure up some idealised thoughts about my life.


However, what you don't see is the back story.


I started this company 28 years ago. At that time, I lived in a 2 bedroom flat for 3 years. My entire living area was converted into an office so I could put forth 100% effort into building a company, which by the way, would eventually employ you.


My diet consisted of baked beans, stew and soup because every dollar I spent went back into this company. I drove a rusty Toyota Corolla with a wonky transmission. I didn't have time to go out with women. Often times, I stayed home on weekends, while my friends went out drinking and partying. In fact, I was married to my business -- hard work, discipline, and sacrifice.


Meanwhile, my friends got jobs. They worked 40 hours a week and made a modest $50,000 a year and spent everyÿdollar they earned. They drove flashy cars and lived in expensive homes and wore fancy designer clothes. Instead of hitting the David Jones for the latest hot fashion item, I was trolling through the discount store extracting any clothing item that didn't look like it was birthed in the 70's. My friends refinanced their mortgages and lived a life of luxury. I, however, did not. I put my time, my money, and my life into a business with a vision that eventually, some day, I too, will be able to afford these luxuries my friends supposedly had.


So, while you physically arrive at the office at 9am, mentally check in at about noon, and then leave at 5pm, I don't. There is no "off" button for me. When you leave the office, you are done and you have a weekend all to yourself. I unfortunately do not have the freedom. I eat, and breathe this company every minute of the day. There is no rest. There is no weekend. There is no happy hour. Every day this business is attached to my hip like a 1 year old special-needs child. You, of course, only see the fruits of that garden -- the nice house, the Subaru, the vacations... you never realise the back story and the sacrifices I've made.


Now, the economy is falling apart and I, the guy that made all the right decisions and saved his money, have to bail-out all the people who didn't. The people that overspent their pay suddenly feel entitled to the same luxuries that I earned and sacrificed a decade of my life for.


Yes, business ownership has its benefits but the price I've paid is steep and notÿwithout wounds.


Unfortunately, the cost of running this business, and employing you, is starting to eclipse the threshold of marginal benefit and let me tell you why:


I am being taxed to death and the government thinks I don't pay enough. I have state taxes. Federal taxes Property taxes. Sales and GSTÿuse taxes. Payroll taxes. Workers compensation. Holiday pay plus a imposed loading.ÿUnemployment taxes. Taxes on taxes. I have to hire a accountant to manage all these taxes and then guess what? I have to pay taxes for employing him. Government mandates and regulations and all the accounting that goes with it, now occupy most of my time. On Oct 15th, I wrote a cheque to the Australian tax Office for $288,000 for quarterly taxes. You know what my "stimulus" cheque was? Zero. Zip. Zilch.


The question I have is this: Who is stimulating the economy? Me, the guy who has provided 14 people good paying jobs and serves over 2,200,000 people per year with a flourishing business? Or, the single mother sitting at home pregnant with her fourth child waiting for her next welfare cheque or some unwanted noncontributingÿrefugee? Obviously, government feels these latterÿare the economic stimulus of this country.


The fact is, if I deducted (Read: Stole) 50% of your pay you'd quit and you wouldn't work here. I mean, why should you? That's nuts. Who wants to get rewarded only 50% of their hard work? Well, I agree which is why your job is in jeopardy.




Here is what many of you don't understand ... to stimulate the economy you need to stimulate what runs the economy. Had the government suddenly mandated to me that I didn't need to pay taxes, guess what? Instead of depositing that $288,000 into the Canberra black-hole, I would have spent it, hired more employees, and generated substantial economic growth. My employees would have enjoyed the wealth of that tax cut in the form of promotions and better salaries. But you can forget it now.




When you have a comatose man on the verge of death, you don't defibrillate and shock his thumb thinking that will bring him back to life, do you? Or, do you defibrillate his heart? Business is at the heart of Australia and always has been. To restart it, you must stimulate it, not kill it. But the power brokers in Canberra believe the poor of Australia are the essential drivers of the Australian economic engine. Nothing could be further from the truth and this is the type of change you can keep.


So where am I going with all this?

It's quite simple.


If any new taxes are levied on me, or my company, my reaction will be swift and simple. I fire you. I fire your co-workers. You can then plead with the government to pay for your mortgage, your 4WD and your child's future. Frankly, it isn't my problem any more.


Then, I will close this company down, move to another country, and retire. You see, I'm done. I'm done with a country that penalises the productive and gives to the unproductive. My motivation to work and to provide jobs will be destroyed, and with it, will be my citizenship.


So, if you lose your job, it won't be at the hands of the economy; it will be at the hands of a politicians that swept through this country changed its financial landscape forever. If that happens, you can find me sitting on a beach, retired, and with no employees to worry about....


Your Employer

John
 
  • Like
Reactions: Les
G'day John,

HELLUVA post, man !!!

I'm done with a country that penalises the productive and gives to the unproductive.

Ain't THAT the truth !!! Hopefully, at the next election, people will see this - if not...... (doesn't bear thinking about) :eek:

Regards,
 
An interesting illustrative piece, actually ties into the novel, Atlas Shrugged (Ayn Rand), 1957.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_Shrugged

From:

"At over one thousand pages in length, she considered Atlas Shrugged to be her magnum opus. The book explores a number of philosophical themes that Rand would subsequently develop into the philosophy of Objectivism.

It centers on the decline of Western civilization, and Rand described it as demonstrating the theme of "the role of man's mind in existence." In doing so it expresses many facets of Rand's philosophy, such as the advocacy of reason, individualism, and the market economy.

As indicated by its original working title The Strike, the plot device is a general strike by leading industrialists and businessmen, led by the protagonist John Galt."

"The theme of Atlas Shrugged is the role of the mind in man's life and, consequently, presentation of a new morality: the morality of rational self-interest.

The main crux of the book surrounds the decision of the "men of the mind" to go on strike, refusing to contribute their inventions, art, business leadership, scientific research, or new ideas of any kind to the rest of the world. Each man of ability eventually reasons (or is convinced) that society hampers him with unnecessary, burdensome regulations and undervalues his contributions to the world, confiscating the profits and sullying the reputation he has rightfully earned.

The peaceful cohesiveness of the world begins to disintegrate as each of these men of ability slowly disappears and society loses those individuals whose mental effort allows it to continue functioning.

The strikers believe that they are crucial to a society that exploits them, denying them freedom or failing to acknowledge their right to self-interest, and the gradual collapse of civilization is triggered by their strike. This is not to say that they believed that giving the creators their due would cost civilization. Rather, the strikers believe that the current irrational altruist/collectivist culture impeded them and therefore the rest of society as well. Thus it would serve no one's interest to continue to allow himself to be exploited, although the strike is not primarily motivated by the harm the current state of society does to others as well.

The novel's title is a reference to the Greek titan Atlas, who was described as holding the celestial globe on his shoulders. In the novel, the mythological allusion comes during a conversation between two protagonists, Francisco d'Anconia and Hank Rearden, near the end of part two, chapter three, where Francisco (convincing Rearden that he is under-appreciated) tells Rearden that if he could suggest to Atlas that he do one thing, it would be to shrug."


Mangoo's letter has been circulating and doing the rounds of internet sites and newspapers/forums for a reasonable time now, but it is widely known as an illustrative piece of objectivism. So what we have is the contrast between capitalism and socialism, an interesting read (Atlas Shrugged), if you can work your way through her epic.

Supposedly, one of the world's greatest selling books, Don't quote me, maybe mangoo might know.
 
Must have appealed to the masses as it's about the third time I've read it here! No harm in duplicating a great read though. As I have been an employer for a long time now, until just recently, it really struck a chord with me.

My advice to any employer who gets a "good" employee is treat them well, pay them as much as you can justify and still watch them like a hawk!
 
To All My Valued Employees,


There have been some rumblings around the office about the future of this company, and more specifically, your job. As you know, the economy has changed for the worse and presents many challenges. However, the good news is this: The economy doesn't pose a threat to your job What does threaten your job; however, is the changing political landscape in this country.


However, let me tell you some little tidbits of fact which might help you decide what is in your best interests.


First, while it is easy to spew rhetoric that casts employers against employees, you have to understand that for every business owner there is a back story. This back story is often neglected and overshadowed by what you see and hear. Sure, you see me park my Subaru Outback outside. You've seen my big home at last year's Christmas party. I'm sure all these flashy icons of luxury conjure up some idealised thoughts about my life.


However, what you don't see is the back story.


I started this company 28 years ago. At that time, I lived in a 2 bedroom flat for 3 years. My entire living area was converted into an office so I could put forth 100% effort into building a company, which by the way, would eventually employ you.


My diet consisted of baked beans, stew and soup because every dollar I spent went back into this company. I drove a rusty Toyota Corolla with a wonky transmission. I didn't have time to go out with women. Often times, I stayed home on weekends, while my friends went out drinking and partying. In fact, I was married to my business -- hard work, discipline, and sacrifice.


Meanwhile, my friends got jobs. They worked 40 hours a week and made a modest $50,000 a year and spent everyÿdollar they earned. They drove flashy cars and lived in expensive homes and wore fancy designer clothes. Instead of hitting the David Jones for the latest hot fashion item, I was trolling through the discount store extracting any clothing item that didn't look like it was birthed in the 70's. My friends refinanced their mortgages and lived a life of luxury. I, however, did not. I put my time, my money, and my life into a business with a vision that eventually, some day, I too, will be able to afford these luxuries my friends supposedly had.


So, while you physically arrive at the office at 9am, mentally check in at about noon, and then leave at 5pm, I don't. There is no "off" button for me. When you leave the office, you are done and you have a weekend all to yourself. I unfortunately do not have the freedom. I eat, and breathe this company every minute of the day. There is no rest. There is no weekend. There is no happy hour. Every day this business is attached to my hip like a 1 year old special-needs child. You, of course, only see the fruits of that garden -- the nice house, the Subaru, the vacations... you never realise the back story and the sacrifices I've made.


Now, the economy is falling apart and I, the guy that made all the right decisions and saved his money, have to bail-out all the people who didn't. The people that overspent their pay suddenly feel entitled to the same luxuries that I earned and sacrificed a decade of my life for.


Yes, business ownership has its benefits but the price I've paid is steep and notÿwithout wounds.


Unfortunately, the cost of running this business, and employing you, is starting to eclipse the threshold of marginal benefit and let me tell you why:


I am being taxed to death and the government thinks I don't pay enough. I have state taxes. Federal taxes Property taxes. Sales and GSTÿuse taxes. Payroll taxes. Workers compensation. Holiday pay plus a imposed loading.ÿUnemployment taxes. Taxes on taxes. I have to hire a accountant to manage all these taxes and then guess what? I have to pay taxes for employing him. Government mandates and regulations and all the accounting that goes with it, now occupy most of my time. On Oct 15th, I wrote a cheque to the Australian tax Office for $288,000 for quarterly taxes. You know what my "stimulus" cheque was? Zero. Zip. Zilch.


The question I have is this: Who is stimulating the economy? Me, the guy who has provided 14 people good paying jobs and serves over 2,200,000 people per year with a flourishing business? Or, the single mother sitting at home pregnant with her fourth child waiting for her next welfare cheque or some unwanted noncontributingÿrefugee? Obviously, government feels these latterÿare the economic stimulus of this country.


The fact is, if I deducted (Read: Stole) 50% of your pay you'd quit and you wouldn't work here. I mean, why should you? That's nuts. Who wants to get rewarded only 50% of their hard work? Well, I agree which is why your job is in jeopardy.




Here is what many of you don't understand ... to stimulate the economy you need to stimulate what runs the economy. Had the government suddenly mandated to me that I didn't need to pay taxes, guess what? Instead of depositing that $288,000 into the Canberra black-hole, I would have spent it, hired more employees, and generated substantial economic growth. My employees would have enjoyed the wealth of that tax cut in the form of promotions and better salaries. But you can forget it now.




When you have a comatose man on the verge of death, you don't defibrillate and shock his thumb thinking that will bring him back to life, do you? Or, do you defibrillate his heart? Business is at the heart of Australia and always has been. To restart it, you must stimulate it, not kill it. But the power brokers in Canberra believe the poor of Australia are the essential drivers of the Australian economic engine. Nothing could be further from the truth and this is the type of change you can keep.


So where am I going with all this?

It's quite simple.


If any new taxes are levied on me, or my company, my reaction will be swift and simple. I fire you. I fire your co-workers. You can then plead with the government to pay for your mortgage, your 4WD and your child's future. Frankly, it isn't my problem any more.


Change of government now..I'll do you for unfair dismissal and hang around untill redundancy is offered

Then, I will close this company down, move to another country, and retire. You see, I'm done. I'm done with a country that penalises the productive and gives to the unproductive. My motivation to work and to provide jobs will be destroyed, and with it, will be my citizenship.

Give me my redundancy and clear off thanks, I'll take my $'s now rather than work for them as it seems like a lot of money


So, if you lose your job, it won't be at the hands of the economy; it will be at the hands of a politicians that swept through this country changed its financial landscape forever. If that happens, you can find me sitting on a beach, retired, and with no employees to worry about....

Once redundant I'll apply for the dole, I'll then sit on a beach in Australia with no boss to worry about, the government is throwing cash around nowadays...Tis the Luky country you know


Your Employer

John


A response from the average employee in this senario?
 
Last edited:
G'day John,

HELLUVA post, man !!!



Ain't THAT the truth !!! Hopefully, at the next election, people will see this - if not...... (doesn't bear thinking about) :eek:

Regards,

I should have mentioned it's not from me but was received in an email awhile back. Agreed that some employees need to read this sort of thing.
 
Reading that made me cry. It's so true except my mum slaved for many years and she still ended up a bankrupt. She had about 6 employees and run her own business for many years. She never took one holiday except closed the take away for 2 days to attend my wedding. She went to work even when she was sick. She even postponed her operation so she could work the profitable days and went back to work as soon as she could after her masectomy.

Her only fault is that she's uneducated, never went to school, never learnt english and did not understand all the taxes and GST and instead of asking help, she did nothing. Finally the government brankrupt her. Her only creditor was the government. They're absolutely ruthless. I hate them. She paid all her suppliers cash and even after they seized all her bank accounts, she still borrowed money from me to pay her suppliers coz they were small struggling businesses just like hers. My mother has the most wonderful heart, such a good person. There was goodwill, she could have sold her business but it was like a part of her she couldn't let go. I think she loved it more than herself.

But it's a good thing in hindsight, why should she work so hard? now she can work part time, claim the dole, have days off work, spend time with her grand children, go and visit family overseas (I pay for it). She's really looking forward to staying with us for a mth to help me with the new babies.

My bro and I inherited my aunty's estate which we will give all to my mum for her retirement when she's out of bankruptcy.
 
Yes this email has been doing the rounds for a long time, I am actually tired of getting spam like this from my mates. I have told them to stop forwarding on anymore emails, other wise I will have to block them.

The letter has some good points and appeals to the small business owners but at the end of the day they would be absolutely mad to send this to their employees. What would it achieve except to infuriate the employees and than they would be even more unwilling to work for you and could turn down right nasty and go out of their way to sabotage the business. Just not worth the hassle.

As mentioned previously look after the good employees let go of the chaff. Be smart, continue to learn and grow. Move with the times, don't let yourself become stale. Once your have had enough, move on, life's too short to be doing something that your heart is not into.
 
Reading that made me cry. It's so true except my mum slaved for many years and she still ended up a bankrupt. She had about 6 employees and run her own business for many years. She never took one holiday except closed the take away for 2 days to attend my wedding. She went to work even when she was sick. She even postponed her operation so she could work the profitable days and went back to work as soon as she could after her masectomy.

Her only fault is that she's uneducated, never went to school, never learnt english and did not understand all the taxes and GST and instead of asking help, she did nothing. Finally the government brankrupt her. Her only creditor was the government. They're absolutely ruthless. I hate them. She paid all her suppliers cash and even after they seized all her bank accounts, she still borrowed money from me to pay her suppliers coz they were small struggling businesses just like hers. My mother has the most wonderful heart, such a good person. There was goodwill, she could have sold her business but it was like a part of her she couldn't let go. I think she loved it more than herself.

But it's a good thing in hindsight, why should she work so hard? now she can work part time, claim the dole, have days off work, spend time with her grand children, go and visit family overseas (I pay for it). She's really looking forward to staying with us for a mth to help me with the new babies.

My bro and I inherited my aunty's estate which we will give all to my mum for her retirement when she's out of bankruptcy.

The ATO is totally ruthless and heartless. They'll be the first to be strung up come the revolution
 
The ATO is totally ruthless and heartless.

Awww....I dunno....depends which side of the fence you sit of course.


From their revenue side of things and the public's cost side of things - absolutely, they are ruthless - but that's a good thing from where I sit. Being a Govt organisation, they obviously have no human qualities, so describing them as heartless is non-sensical, although some here disagree.


I choose to sit on the ATO's cost side, that is my revenue side. They are a wonderful Tenant and I simply love them to bits. Long live the ATO....(and keep paying your rent).
 
G'day John,

HELLUVA post, man !!!

Quote:
I'm done with a country that penalises the productive and gives to the unproductive



Ain't THAT the truth !!! Hopefully, at the next election, people will see this - if not...... (doesn't bear thinking about) :eek:

Regards,

Les,

You don't see the irony of giving the 'ol high five to this post in a forum that is largely built around the notion of the application of loanable capital for the purchase of existing housing stock at a time when the availability of capital for productive investment is suffering?

Perhaps next election the govt might be pressured to force banks to stop subsidising resi mortgages and oblige then to move their capital back to supporting the construction of new productive infrastructure.:eek:

TF
 
Her only creditor was the government. They're absolutely ruthless. I hate them.
Nothing I hate more than dealing with the many idiots in the public services, they are a waste of taxpayer money and oxygen.
There are scum employers and employees. I work for one of the largest companies in this country, they are making excuses to sack workers who have 10, 20 years service, without paying redundancy. And there is nothing the union nor the legislation can do about it.
 
G'day TF,

You don't see the irony of giving the 'ol high five to this post in a forum that is largely built around the notion of the application of loanable capital for the purchase of existing housing stock at a time when the availability of capital for productive investment is suffering?

It's obvious YOU do, TF. But no, I try to be a little more open-minded than that. If "capital for productive investment is suffering", HOW is that the fault of resi landlords? I provide accommodation for others who can't yet afford their own properties (didn't YOU start off that way too? Most do)

Perhaps next election the govt might be pressured to force banks to stop subsidising resi mortgages and oblige then to move their capital back to supporting the construction of new productive infrastructure.
Que sera sera, TF.

Right now, I'd be APPLAUDING the current Govt. if they would spend "stimulus package money" on Infrastructure, thus creating jobs and future benefits - rather than just handing it out to all and sundry. To me, it's like they are saying:-

"OK, we're in a Financial Crisis (brought on by too much borrowing and not enough saving) - so, we'll borrow some more and spend it all - that'll fix it!!" :confused: :eek:

Regards,
 
Right now, I'd be APPLAUDING the current Govt. if they would spend "stimulus package money" on Infrastructure, thus creating jobs and future benefits - rather than just handing it out to all and sundry. To me, it's like they are saying:-

"OK, we're in a Financial Crisis (brought on by too much borrowing and not enough saving) - so, we'll borrow some more and spend it all - that'll fix it!!" :confused: :eek:
You speak the truth! Nice!
 
G'day TF,



It's obvious YOU do, TF. But no, I try to be a little more open-minded than that. If "capital for productive investment is suffering", HOW is that the fault of resi landlords? I provide accommodation for others who can't yet afford their own properties (didn't YOU start off that way too? Most do)


Que sera sera, TF.

Right now, I'd be APPLAUDING the current Govt. if they would spend "stimulus package money" on Infrastructure, thus creating jobs and future benefits - rather than just handing it out to all and sundry. To me, it's like they are saying:-

"OK, we're in a Financial Crisis (brought on by too much borrowing and not enough saving) - so, we'll borrow some more and spend it all - that'll fix it!!" :confused: :eek:

Regards,

At the end of the day im a realist, im just a small investor in a big world, although Australia is a democracy, my individual vote counts for little.

So instead of wasting energy stressing about it, i just accept it as part of the times. What i can control is the direction of my investments. Its my money and i can invest it how i choose.

If the Australian population is happy at large to support a government that is borrowing to support current consumption, thats ok, that money will flow into company's profits which will bennefit me through being an investor in shares.

If the government does this successfully such that it supports consumption during the downturn and then takes its foot off the pedal as global economic conditions improve, then there is a chance that they can retrieve that money through the current taxation system. Let me highlight this with a very simplistic example:

Company A is making $100 profit and pays tax of $30.
Economic downturn arrives:
Company A's profit starts to drop to $50 and pays tax of $15
Global financial crisis impacts fully
If no government expansionary fiscal policy:
Company A's goes bankrupt: no current and no future taxes
If government enacts expansionary fiscal policy:
Company A's profit drops to $30, pays tax of $9, but as conditions improve profit goes back up to $50 and pays tax of $15.

Now of course this is a very simplistic example, but it does highlight the justification for supporting an economy during a downturn.

Now lets switch this on its head and assume that the government continues to spend willy nilly into the future and starts to run a number of years of serious budget deficits. Government debt as a % of GDP skyrockets.
The government will at some point be forced to increase its tax of the economy to start paying back debt.

At this point as a small owner of private capital, there is not much i can do as an individual to influence government decisions, but i CAN CONTROL my capital. If it got to the point where i cant make satisfactory returns on my capital after tax, i can move that money overseas to another country that encourages private investment. And this provides the key i think for small investors, with increased globalisation of trade, there is also increased globalisation in the movement of capital.
 
Back
Top