Hey guys, another question here.
I got an RPDATA report for a house I was interested in. I analyzed the report and I am finding it confusing. The house in Marsden I was interested in had a selling price of $330,000. Now usually I think if a house has a selling price of $330,000 then I should be offering about $310-315 K, yet in the RPDATA report, in Jul (latest figures shown), similar size houses (same size, make, number of rooms, bathrooms etc etc) in the same suburb were selling at approx. $280,000. Now I thought that maybe houses had gone up in the past 5 months, yet when I did a profile search for the Marsden area, it has had negative growth.
I'm just a little confused as it doesn’t make sense to me at all. Searches of similar houses are producing the same asking prices, around $330-360K. Obviously as an investor, I don't want to overpay. Is it possible that houses in the area are being listed for $50k more than what buyers would accept? Should I bed upper $200k range?
I got an RPDATA report for a house I was interested in. I analyzed the report and I am finding it confusing. The house in Marsden I was interested in had a selling price of $330,000. Now usually I think if a house has a selling price of $330,000 then I should be offering about $310-315 K, yet in the RPDATA report, in Jul (latest figures shown), similar size houses (same size, make, number of rooms, bathrooms etc etc) in the same suburb were selling at approx. $280,000. Now I thought that maybe houses had gone up in the past 5 months, yet when I did a profile search for the Marsden area, it has had negative growth.
I'm just a little confused as it doesn’t make sense to me at all. Searches of similar houses are producing the same asking prices, around $330-360K. Obviously as an investor, I don't want to overpay. Is it possible that houses in the area are being listed for $50k more than what buyers would accept? Should I bed upper $200k range?