Do you mean had?
The caveat would be gone if the land is transferred already. She probably had a valid caveat due to her equitable interest in the property under the Family Law Act. After the court order and the transfer I am not so sure.
Actuall she probably might still have the interest as her interest isn't 'transferred' to the ex until payment. But this still doesn't help because the bank, with a higher interest or greater priority, has taken back the property.
But, I am not a lawyer, just talking crap maybe. Or probably.
The caveat would be gone if the land is transferred already. She probably had a valid caveat due to her equitable interest in the property under the Family Law Act. After the court order and the transfer I am not so sure.
Actuall she probably might still have the interest as her interest isn't 'transferred' to the ex until payment. But this still doesn't help because the bank, with a higher interest or greater priority, has taken back the property.
But, I am not a lawyer, just talking crap maybe. Or probably.