I haven't started reading yet
http://www.planning.wa.gov.au/637.asp
I'll add some notes when I finish reading
http://www.planning.wa.gov.au/637.asp
I'll add some notes when I finish reading
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I still love the fact your Private Open Space requirements are so small - well compared to Melbourne
Cheers
Oscar
myf, that's potentially huge news for your lot.
any change to the MD provisions?
.....so my R20 1569sqm site can now fit 4? Still trying to get my head around it!
It doesn't look like any changes to multi dwellings.
The impact on Highgate is impressive - if I wasn't going to do a multidwelling I have a massive fall back plan. Subject to local DAP it is now a duplex block (2 street front green titles possible) with 70% site coverage and 1m setback.
Has this been something in the pipeline for a while westminster? and was it expected/known that the minimum site areas would drop for some r codes?
Its crazy to think that some peoples properties have just jumped 50, 100, 200k in value and a lot of them may not even realize...
good news!
Have you run the numbers on this? The build cost should be much lower and the resale values higher for each of the 2 new dwellings than for the previous 3. Could be a similar outcome for profit?
Nope sorry
You'll need to still meet the 450 average but with the 350 sqm minimum lot size you can vary the size of your lots if you wanted. But in your case I'd keep them as is around 500sqm each.
The R20 changes are really good for people that want to build behind an existing house as they can then do a 350sqm lot in the rear and 550sqm at the front to cater for the existing house.
It has been in the pipeline for awhile - I've been checking for around 6mths since I knew they were working on them. I'm not high enough up the chain to see drafts and things so I was guessing the Ancillary provisions would be coming in but I had no idea about the reductions in minimum site areas. I'm sure there were plenty of people who knew about the minimum site areas but I wasn't one of them but I don't think it was known or expected - if that makes sense?
Has this been something in the pipeline for a while westminster? and was it expected/known that the minimum site areas would drop for some r codes?
Its crazy to think that some peoples properties have just jumped 50, 100, 200k in value and a lot of them may not even realize...
good news!
If anyone pays over 900/sqm for a site in bloody spearwood they need their head read