From: See Change
Thought I might add an interesting , though trivial observation to the ongoing debate of the benefits of shares Vs property.
While browsing at my favorite book store ( Borders at Macquarie ) I was struck my the massive number of books on share trading as opposed to the number of books on property investing. An attempt to count the books was quickly discarded in favour of a quick count of the number of shelves devoted to each topic.
The result?
26 shelves for shares
2 1/2 shelves for property
My initial thoughts are that share traders need the money by writing books more than property investors and share trading is a lot more complex than property investing.
happy investing see change
Thought I might add an interesting , though trivial observation to the ongoing debate of the benefits of shares Vs property.
While browsing at my favorite book store ( Borders at Macquarie ) I was struck my the massive number of books on share trading as opposed to the number of books on property investing. An attempt to count the books was quickly discarded in favour of a quick count of the number of shelves devoted to each topic.
The result?
26 shelves for shares
2 1/2 shelves for property
My initial thoughts are that share traders need the money by writing books more than property investors and share trading is a lot more complex than property investing.
happy investing see change
Last edited by a moderator: