For a bit of background, check this thread out. Most info here remains the same, we are about 9 months into the 18 months house-sit.
http://somersoft.com/forums/showthread.php?t=76870
My current loan value is about $305k, we have set up a MISA and this value includes funds held in there.
We are now, due to a handful of non-interesting reasons, looking to remove the guarantee security from my in-laws property. I have spoken to CBA and understand that they will order a valuation and we will pay (capitalise) LMI according to our current LVR.
Purchase price in Dec 2009 was $340k, a residex valuation from Apr 2012 puts it at $320k-$355k (Thanks to a well known broker on this forum for providing that).
So if CBA gets a valuation of:
-$320k, we sneak in at 95% LVR (I'm sure I could find a grand to push the numbers), pay huge LMI and achieve our desired outcome.
-$355k, we get about 86% LVR, pay less LMI and achieve the outcome cheaper.
Both acceptable scenarios.
However, I am worried that Val could come in lower, and I see a worst case scenario something like this: CBA decides they need more security from the in-laws property than they currently have, they claim $60k or so (in security) and we have made our situation worse.
1. Is this a likely situation?
2. If so, How likely?
3. Is there a worse case I could be facing?
4. If you know Clarkson, what do you think my chances of a favourable valuation 30 months after a 2009 purchase are?
5. Anybody want to do me a fresh residex valuation to set my mind at ease?
http://somersoft.com/forums/showthread.php?t=76870
My current loan value is about $305k, we have set up a MISA and this value includes funds held in there.
We are now, due to a handful of non-interesting reasons, looking to remove the guarantee security from my in-laws property. I have spoken to CBA and understand that they will order a valuation and we will pay (capitalise) LMI according to our current LVR.
Purchase price in Dec 2009 was $340k, a residex valuation from Apr 2012 puts it at $320k-$355k (Thanks to a well known broker on this forum for providing that).
So if CBA gets a valuation of:
-$320k, we sneak in at 95% LVR (I'm sure I could find a grand to push the numbers), pay huge LMI and achieve our desired outcome.
-$355k, we get about 86% LVR, pay less LMI and achieve the outcome cheaper.
Both acceptable scenarios.
However, I am worried that Val could come in lower, and I see a worst case scenario something like this: CBA decides they need more security from the in-laws property than they currently have, they claim $60k or so (in security) and we have made our situation worse.
1. Is this a likely situation?
2. If so, How likely?
3. Is there a worse case I could be facing?
4. If you know Clarkson, what do you think my chances of a favourable valuation 30 months after a 2009 purchase are?
5. Anybody want to do me a fresh residex valuation to set my mind at ease?