From: Owen .
Just wondering who most of my fellow investors use when it comes to doing the property conveyancing on their new IP's?
My understanding is if a contract is checked and anything goes wrong with the purchase process that caused by some clause in the contract, a solicitor can be held liable whereas a conveyancer cannot. Is this correct?
The reason I ask is conveyancers can be considerably cheaper that a solicitor for simple conveyancing work. A solicitor is a must for any "creative" contract work though.
Just wondering who most of my fellow investors use when it comes to doing the property conveyancing on their new IP's?
My understanding is if a contract is checked and anything goes wrong with the purchase process that caused by some clause in the contract, a solicitor can be held liable whereas a conveyancer cannot. Is this correct?
The reason I ask is conveyancers can be considerably cheaper that a solicitor for simple conveyancing work. A solicitor is a must for any "creative" contract work though.
Last edited by a moderator: