How do you know most of the market has gone up when you only know Melb.? My suburb in Townsville, according to RP Data, has had a cumulative 2% rise in 4 years. Not enough to get out of bed for.
I only said the Melbourne market has gone up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How do you know most of the market has gone up when you only know Melb.? My suburb in Townsville, according to RP Data, has had a cumulative 2% rise in 4 years. Not enough to get out of bed for.
Just as an example;
If I invested $40,000 in the stock market and the market dropped by 50% I'd lose $20,000.
If I invested $40,000 and borrowed $360,000 to invest in a $400,000 property and the real estate market dropped by 50% I'd lose $200,000.
Most people who invest in stocks understand that CFDs are one of the riskiest ways you can trade because the leverage increases your gains and your losses. I think sometimes people forget how leveraging in the property market increases our risk and our exposure to losses. For whatever reason people consider it as a much safer investment. I suppose it's because property has performed so well in Australia in recent history.
I still think understanding the impact of a property crash is very important. I'm confused as to why people here disagree with what I'm saying? I think what I'm saying is very reasonable.
Just as an example;
If I invested $40,000 in the stock market and the market dropped by 50% I'd lose $20,000.
If I invested $40,000 and borrowed $360,000 to invest in a $400,000 property and the real estate market dropped by 50% I'd lose $200,000.
Most people who invest in stocks understand that CFDs are one of the riskiest ways you can trade because the leverage increases your gains and your losses. I think sometimes people forget how leveraging in the property market increases our risk and our exposure to losses. For whatever reason people consider it as a much safer investment. I suppose it's because property has performed so well in Australia in recent history.
I still think understanding the impact of a property crash is very important. I'm confused as to why people here disagree with what I'm saying? I think what I'm saying is very reasonable.
Just as an example;
If I invested $40,000 in the stock market and the market dropped by 50% I'd lose $20,000.
If I invested $40,000 and borrowed $360,000 to invest in a $400,000 property and the real estate market dropped by 50% I'd lose $200,000.
Most people who invest in stocks understand that CFDs are one of the riskiest ways you can trade because the leverage increases your gains and your losses. I think sometimes people forget how leveraging in the property market increases our risk and our exposure to losses. For whatever reason people consider it as a much safer investment. I suppose it's because property has performed so well in Australia in recent history.
I still think understanding the impact of a property crash is very important. I'm confused as to why people here disagree with what I'm saying? I think what I'm saying is very reasonable.
I'm still a student! No investing experience yet. Why? Do you disagree?
If I invested $40,000 and borrowed $360,000 to invest in a $400,000 property and the real estate market dropped by 50% I'd lose $200,000.
I'm still a student! No investing experience yet.
It's out of context. Scott Pape claimed there was going to be an IMMINENT bust in 2005. He was wrong. So what does Mrs NoExperience do? Comes in and goes against the grain with generic information that we all know that really has nothing to do with the OP.Why all the agression and so defensive? I dont think any of what belle has been saying is wrong or out of context. It does sound like text book stuff, true - but they are relevant, in a broad sense anyway.
I'm not sure how this is relevant? No one has overlooked anything. But thanks for the straw advice. Perhaps you'd also like to tell us that we need to check for cars before we cross the road?I think experienced investors should not overlook that anything can happen.
It's out of context. Scott Pape claimed there was going to be an IMMINENT bust in 2005. He was wrong. So what does Mrs NoExperience do? Comes in and goes against the grain with generic information that we all know that really has nothing to do with the OP.
Experienced investors haven't taken kindly to a novice coming in and lecturing them about property investment and quite rightly they have told her so.
Please remember it was Belle who came in and started telling people Scott Pape had a point when in fact he didn't. She has taken his point (minus the ultimately pertinent 2005) bit and constructed a straw argument to take on other investors.
What is it with the bottom end of Gen Y? It seems that 12 years of being told "wow, you guys are the first generation to go through your whole education with computers" has made you all arrogant know-alls.
A tip:
Intelligence doesn't peak at 19
Not sure what made you come on here with no experience and tell experienced and successful investors how it all works?
At the end of the day communism was good in theory, but experience has told us otherwise. That said I think its a little harsh criticising a whole generation just for wanting to contribute to a discussion.
It can sometimes works that way on the up ward trend,and the same way on the down side,and sometimes like now it pays to be right out of the equities markets with cash waiting,trading cfd,s is very high risk even for the experienced in this time..People who use CFDs use it as a leverage yes - but if you traded CFDs - u know you can minimize the losses. At one stage during the GFC - over say 1 month, i was making 1-2K an hour, or sometimes 15 minutes just by trading on ASX200 indices as it was so volatile.