Hey guys, i've been doing some heavy reading within the forum and learning lots so to all of you... thank you!
Being my 2nd IP, i'm looking for a 1 into 2 split block scenario. Something to renovate and live in for 12 months and in that time subdivide and sell off 2nd piece of land to build equity and then go again.
Now the problem is, within my budget (financial comfort zone), i've narrowed my searches to 2 properties that both reside in the BCC flood map zone. It doesn't matter too much if it flooded in 74/2011 or if its potential creek flooding that is the culprit. My main concern is over the future demand and re-sale of such land and properties. In 2 properties i'm looking at, one was subject to 2011 floods (and its priced accordingly) and the other is only subject to potential creek flooding.
On the one hand i thought that in 5 years time, the negative opinions of the recent floods may subside and values will normalise a little. However in the recent draft BCC city plan, it alludes to higher building requirements for properties in flood map areas. A mate of mine is in BCC town planning and his opinion is quite negative on flood map properties. Reasons: insurance premium hikes imminent, lower resale values, stricter building requirements.
All my estimates in this investment are on the LOW side (for obvious reasons) and its still viable financially.
Should I proceed and face the risk?
or
Save up for a few more months and in that time something may come up thats not in a flood map zone?
Being my 2nd IP, i'm looking for a 1 into 2 split block scenario. Something to renovate and live in for 12 months and in that time subdivide and sell off 2nd piece of land to build equity and then go again.
Now the problem is, within my budget (financial comfort zone), i've narrowed my searches to 2 properties that both reside in the BCC flood map zone. It doesn't matter too much if it flooded in 74/2011 or if its potential creek flooding that is the culprit. My main concern is over the future demand and re-sale of such land and properties. In 2 properties i'm looking at, one was subject to 2011 floods (and its priced accordingly) and the other is only subject to potential creek flooding.
On the one hand i thought that in 5 years time, the negative opinions of the recent floods may subside and values will normalise a little. However in the recent draft BCC city plan, it alludes to higher building requirements for properties in flood map areas. A mate of mine is in BCC town planning and his opinion is quite negative on flood map properties. Reasons: insurance premium hikes imminent, lower resale values, stricter building requirements.
All my estimates in this investment are on the LOW side (for obvious reasons) and its still viable financially.
Should I proceed and face the risk?
or
Save up for a few more months and in that time something may come up thats not in a flood map zone?