Thanks to LynnH and TPFKAD for their kind thoughts re my US "heads of agreement". I decided to start a thread on the topic so as not to hijack other threads, but based on my unfortunate experience with the "Why NOT to buy in the USA?" thread, I won't be sharing as much detail as I did in that thread.
I have been researching the US market for over a year, and decided about 9 months or more ago that I'd target multi-family properties (ie blocks of apartments). My motivations for doing this rather than buying houses are:
1) Property management - is generally woeful for houses in the USA. Renters almost exclusively live in apartment complexes there; not so much in houses. The vast majority who own houses as IPs manage the properties themselves. If I have an apartment complex, I'll have on-site management, and that means a staff whose sole focus is looking after my investment, and I just have to manage the on-site management.
2) Finance - without a FICO and SSN and other things that US residents have, it's much easier to borrow commercially than it is for residential property. It's much easier to borrow $1M than $100K. Property being CF+, larger property investments - with larger numbers of tenants - are seen as less risky to lenders than small investments.
I spent April in the USA getting to know my chosen location (a thriving southern city > 500K people). I met some fantastic people, and felt that my choice to invest in this area was a solid one; what I saw confirmed what I'd deduced from reading and looking at statistics before I went.
In this part of the USA, the typical complex size is around 250-300 units. I'm looking at a "small" complex of around 80 units, which I plan to rehab (renovate) and convert to affordable housing for seniors, because I've established that this is an area of huge demand and almost zero supply in that area. The complex consists of several buildings, nearly all of which is single-storey, on 2 acres.
I'll be getting in with no money down (All figures US$.) The purchase price is around $2M, and a $500K rehab is needed. (New roof, some electrical, some smoke alarms and signs, repaint exterior and interior, new carpet, catching up neglected maintenance, and quite a lot of landscaping.)
"Purchase plus rehab" cost is $2.5M, and I can borrow 80% of this on what's essentially a "commercial lo doc". So at settlement, the vendor will receive the entire purchase price of $2M from the lender. The vendor will then lend back to me the $500K needed for the rehab, which is "my" equity contribution to the venture. This loan will be secured by a second lien (second mortgage) over the property, and is being disclosed to the lender.
The forecast after-repair value (ARV) of the property as seniors' accommodation is $3.5M. So in a year, I should be able to refinance to 80% of $3.5M = $2.8M, which would allow me to pay back the vendor the $500K that I owe him. I know everybody's thinking "what if it doesn't value up? There are two ways of securing this, and I'm not sure which way we'll go yet:
1) Preferred option, if lender agreeable - some lenders will appraise the property in its after-repair state now, and approve (in principle) the loan up to 80% of the ARV, with progressive drawdown, ie drawdown would be limited to $2M until rehab is complete.
2) Backup option - vendor is agreeable to a provision in the contract for the $500K loan period to be extended for up to several years if required.
The forecast P&L figures suggest that after rehab, the figures will look something like this:
Gross income: ________________ $800K
Expenses: ___________________ $500K
Net Operating Income: _________ $300K
Mortgage interest (6% of $2.5M): $150K
Positive cashflow: _____________ $150K
I already have most of my team - brokers, on-site management, handyman etc - identified, and feel extremely confident that I've met some top-notch, reliable, trustworthy people.
I have kept a detailed blog elsewhere, including a reproduction of the constructive bits of the deleted "Why NOT to buy in the USA?" thread, and full information on this deal, the location, some other deals I saw, etc. Those who are interested in viewing it can contact me via PM.
I have been researching the US market for over a year, and decided about 9 months or more ago that I'd target multi-family properties (ie blocks of apartments). My motivations for doing this rather than buying houses are:
1) Property management - is generally woeful for houses in the USA. Renters almost exclusively live in apartment complexes there; not so much in houses. The vast majority who own houses as IPs manage the properties themselves. If I have an apartment complex, I'll have on-site management, and that means a staff whose sole focus is looking after my investment, and I just have to manage the on-site management.
2) Finance - without a FICO and SSN and other things that US residents have, it's much easier to borrow commercially than it is for residential property. It's much easier to borrow $1M than $100K. Property being CF+, larger property investments - with larger numbers of tenants - are seen as less risky to lenders than small investments.
I spent April in the USA getting to know my chosen location (a thriving southern city > 500K people). I met some fantastic people, and felt that my choice to invest in this area was a solid one; what I saw confirmed what I'd deduced from reading and looking at statistics before I went.
In this part of the USA, the typical complex size is around 250-300 units. I'm looking at a "small" complex of around 80 units, which I plan to rehab (renovate) and convert to affordable housing for seniors, because I've established that this is an area of huge demand and almost zero supply in that area. The complex consists of several buildings, nearly all of which is single-storey, on 2 acres.
I'll be getting in with no money down (All figures US$.) The purchase price is around $2M, and a $500K rehab is needed. (New roof, some electrical, some smoke alarms and signs, repaint exterior and interior, new carpet, catching up neglected maintenance, and quite a lot of landscaping.)
"Purchase plus rehab" cost is $2.5M, and I can borrow 80% of this on what's essentially a "commercial lo doc". So at settlement, the vendor will receive the entire purchase price of $2M from the lender. The vendor will then lend back to me the $500K needed for the rehab, which is "my" equity contribution to the venture. This loan will be secured by a second lien (second mortgage) over the property, and is being disclosed to the lender.
The forecast after-repair value (ARV) of the property as seniors' accommodation is $3.5M. So in a year, I should be able to refinance to 80% of $3.5M = $2.8M, which would allow me to pay back the vendor the $500K that I owe him. I know everybody's thinking "what if it doesn't value up? There are two ways of securing this, and I'm not sure which way we'll go yet:
1) Preferred option, if lender agreeable - some lenders will appraise the property in its after-repair state now, and approve (in principle) the loan up to 80% of the ARV, with progressive drawdown, ie drawdown would be limited to $2M until rehab is complete.
2) Backup option - vendor is agreeable to a provision in the contract for the $500K loan period to be extended for up to several years if required.
The forecast P&L figures suggest that after rehab, the figures will look something like this:
Gross income: ________________ $800K
Expenses: ___________________ $500K
Net Operating Income: _________ $300K
Mortgage interest (6% of $2.5M): $150K
Positive cashflow: _____________ $150K
I already have most of my team - brokers, on-site management, handyman etc - identified, and feel extremely confident that I've met some top-notch, reliable, trustworthy people.
I have kept a detailed blog elsewhere, including a reproduction of the constructive bits of the deleted "Why NOT to buy in the USA?" thread, and full information on this deal, the location, some other deals I saw, etc. Those who are interested in viewing it can contact me via PM.