Hi,
I've just bought a copy of a magazine- first issue of "WealthCreator". (A bit late- it wasSep/Oct edition)
The concept seemed really good.
It started with stories of ordinary investorswho had done OK.
Fair enough.
But there was a common thread in these stories. People had gone into IPs by attending "National Investment Institute" seminars.
Which coinceidentally had a double page middle-of-magazine ad.
There was mention in the mag of mezzanine finance- was NII Henry Kaye's group- with the $13K seminars?
API magazine does similar with its advertisers. And it's a pity. I feel it spoils the integrity of the articles somewhat. I know magazines need to advertise.
But I felt that WC mag was doing it much more blatantly than API. I'm disinclined to buy more.
I have to be careful here. I am NOT saying the mag is bad.It has a lot of good articles. The intro issue was$4.95, which made it good value. And probably explains the close association between atticles and advertisers.
Nevertheless...
I've just bought a copy of a magazine- first issue of "WealthCreator". (A bit late- it wasSep/Oct edition)
The concept seemed really good.
It started with stories of ordinary investorswho had done OK.
Fair enough.
But there was a common thread in these stories. People had gone into IPs by attending "National Investment Institute" seminars.
Which coinceidentally had a double page middle-of-magazine ad.
There was mention in the mag of mezzanine finance- was NII Henry Kaye's group- with the $13K seminars?
API magazine does similar with its advertisers. And it's a pity. I feel it spoils the integrity of the articles somewhat. I know magazines need to advertise.
But I felt that WC mag was doing it much more blatantly than API. I'm disinclined to buy more.
I have to be careful here. I am NOT saying the mag is bad.It has a lot of good articles. The intro issue was$4.95, which made it good value. And probably explains the close association between atticles and advertisers.
Nevertheless...