I've been given conflicting advice on the topic.
My situation is the following:
- property settled 18th June - currently residing in it as PPOR
- RE has advised that I should sign an agreement with them circa November 2014, advertise the property available for rent from 19th December allowing time for tenants to give notice at previous address and move in before xmas and still comply with 6 months of living at PPOR therefore being able to claim the 6 month / 6 year rule.
Elsewhere, I have read that merely the intent to lease the property constitutes it becoming an IP (therefore signing an agreement prior to the 18th December would mean we would fall short of having it as a PPOR for the minimum of 6 months.
It would be great if the first were true as with Xmas/New Year we would be missing out on a few weeks of rent. Can anyone confirm?
Thanks.
My situation is the following:
- property settled 18th June - currently residing in it as PPOR
- RE has advised that I should sign an agreement with them circa November 2014, advertise the property available for rent from 19th December allowing time for tenants to give notice at previous address and move in before xmas and still comply with 6 months of living at PPOR therefore being able to claim the 6 month / 6 year rule.
Elsewhere, I have read that merely the intent to lease the property constitutes it becoming an IP (therefore signing an agreement prior to the 18th December would mean we would fall short of having it as a PPOR for the minimum of 6 months.
It would be great if the first were true as with Xmas/New Year we would be missing out on a few weeks of rent. Can anyone confirm?
Thanks.