DaleGG 24th Apr, 2002 #21 Reply: 1.2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 From: Dale Gatherum-Goss Hi Owen Thank you for clarifying this issue. I wish you well with it and am glad that you are comfortable with this approach. Dale Last edited by a moderator: 5th Apr, 2017
Reply: 1.2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 From: Dale Gatherum-Goss Hi Owen Thank you for clarifying this issue. I wish you well with it and am glad that you are comfortable with this approach. Dale
O Owen 24th Apr, 2002 #22 Reply: 1.2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 From: Owen . Hi Dale, You were either sitting there shaking your head as you wrote that post or else your tongue was firmly in your cheek ;>) Don't worry. I only play by the rules and don't do anything without a precedent. I don't have a need to test the ATO on anything. Owen "Gambling promises the poor what property performs for the rich – something for nothing" Last edited by a moderator: 5th Apr, 2017
Reply: 1.2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 From: Owen . Hi Dale, You were either sitting there shaking your head as you wrote that post or else your tongue was firmly in your cheek ;>) Don't worry. I only play by the rules and don't do anything without a precedent. I don't have a need to test the ATO on anything. Owen "Gambling promises the poor what property performs for the rich – something for nothing"
W WebBoard Guest 25th Apr, 2002 #23 Reply: 1.2.1.1.1.1.2.1 From: E L Thanks for all the very informative posts everyone - much appreciated. PT - you'd have my vote but I'm sure my Sydney coordinator would never speak to me again!! (-: Cheers EL Last edited by a moderator: 5th Apr, 2017
Reply: 1.2.1.1.1.1.2.1 From: E L Thanks for all the very informative posts everyone - much appreciated. PT - you'd have my vote but I'm sure my Sydney coordinator would never speak to me again!! (-: Cheers EL
