So just getting back to the original question regarding tactics:
I attended an auction yesterday, good crowd, 'Will Be Sold Today' - 'Realistic Reserve' etc announced by the Auctioneer
Yep! Sold today - $76,000 above the reserve - again by a family outbidding the local developers by a whisker, People eager to get into this area - a very small, two bedroom,asbestos faux brick clad 'weekender' in a redeveloping residential area - land value but at least the house is habitable - and do you know what they did?
The buyer opened the auction at not far below the (later announced) reserve, was in the bidding all the way through, was sitting on a fence directly opposite the Auctioneer, was obviously absolutely determined to buy the place - this was a youngish couple with small children, both radiated determination although remained sitting on the fence (perhaps to stop their legs fromshaking?).
And good on them! They have now bought a property which will provide them with much enjoyment over many years to come, plus have happily paid $30,000 more than I paid for something similar in the next street five months ago.
Is Melbourne HOT? Sure, but more importantly, bidding at auction is quick, clean, transparent and brings forth a decision.
And did they immediately go inside their new treasure and eagerly sign the Contract? You bet they did, the Agent has the underbidder's details, too, but that property was definitely 'sold' on the fall of the hammer.
By the way, I paid particular attention to the Auctioneer's reading of the Terms of Auction.
These Terms are quite clear - by participating in the Auction you agree to these Terms, which are legally binding.
Sure, the Sale or otherwise transation regarding Land is covered by the Instruments Act and requires the agreement to transact to be in writing, and has already been mentioned, the Auctioneer has the delegated authority to sign on behalf of the Vendor or the Buyer
Over the years, I have known one property knocked down to one party to be sold later (minutes later) to the underbidder when the top bidder went inside and then thought they could negotiate a lower price! The very experienced agency had kept the underbidder engaged in coversation while the buyer was meant to be signing the contracts - so the top bidder was escorted out the back door and the underbidder was invited in the front door and they then signed the contract!
The law is one thing, dealing with inexperienced buyers is another - who knows what happened in there?
But yesterday, there was no doubt that the Terms of Auction impose a legal responsibility on any bidder and counting the number of Agents in the crowd, smiling and pleasant though they may be, they are there to perform a legal authority on behalf of the vendor and perform it they will!
Cheers
Kristine
I attended an auction yesterday, good crowd, 'Will Be Sold Today' - 'Realistic Reserve' etc announced by the Auctioneer
Yep! Sold today - $76,000 above the reserve - again by a family outbidding the local developers by a whisker, People eager to get into this area - a very small, two bedroom,asbestos faux brick clad 'weekender' in a redeveloping residential area - land value but at least the house is habitable - and do you know what they did?
The buyer opened the auction at not far below the (later announced) reserve, was in the bidding all the way through, was sitting on a fence directly opposite the Auctioneer, was obviously absolutely determined to buy the place - this was a youngish couple with small children, both radiated determination although remained sitting on the fence (perhaps to stop their legs fromshaking?).
And good on them! They have now bought a property which will provide them with much enjoyment over many years to come, plus have happily paid $30,000 more than I paid for something similar in the next street five months ago.
Is Melbourne HOT? Sure, but more importantly, bidding at auction is quick, clean, transparent and brings forth a decision.
And did they immediately go inside their new treasure and eagerly sign the Contract? You bet they did, the Agent has the underbidder's details, too, but that property was definitely 'sold' on the fall of the hammer.
By the way, I paid particular attention to the Auctioneer's reading of the Terms of Auction.
These Terms are quite clear - by participating in the Auction you agree to these Terms, which are legally binding.
Sure, the Sale or otherwise transation regarding Land is covered by the Instruments Act and requires the agreement to transact to be in writing, and has already been mentioned, the Auctioneer has the delegated authority to sign on behalf of the Vendor or the Buyer
Over the years, I have known one property knocked down to one party to be sold later (minutes later) to the underbidder when the top bidder went inside and then thought they could negotiate a lower price! The very experienced agency had kept the underbidder engaged in coversation while the buyer was meant to be signing the contracts - so the top bidder was escorted out the back door and the underbidder was invited in the front door and they then signed the contract!
The law is one thing, dealing with inexperienced buyers is another - who knows what happened in there?
But yesterday, there was no doubt that the Terms of Auction impose a legal responsibility on any bidder and counting the number of Agents in the crowd, smiling and pleasant though they may be, they are there to perform a legal authority on behalf of the vendor and perform it they will!
Cheers
Kristine