There was an interesting article recently about the 'sexual orientation' pay gap.
http://www.smh.com.au/business/the-...less-but-women-earn-more-20150227-13qmxk.html
- Gay men were paid less on average than straight men.
- Lesbian women were paid more on average than straight women.
When you look at our discussion above through the eyes of 'masculine energy' and 'feminine energy' (rather than a persons sex) this also makes sense to me.
In fact, this to me is evidence it's not a sex based thing.
Exactly right. Dominant players in the workforce will always outperform submissive/passive workers. If you did a wage study on this metric, I'm sure you would find dominant/aggressive workers will achieve the highest advancement and pay grades (both male and female), leaving their counterparts in the dust.