Search results

So nothing then. No reference, just ludicrous claims. I dont think even LibGS would claim that the worlds most severe storms ever, have occurred in the last 10 years. You seem to believe the IPCC on everything else except for this? You are right that there is a clear trend though. You...

What is your reference for that. It's not the IPCC. It's not the BOM for the Australian experience.

I did, and I also note you didn't comment on it.

The BOM charts are there for anyone to see. No increase in frequency despite big increases to greenhouse gases. In fact clear downward trend in frequency, and slight downward trend in severity. With regard to the IPCC, they say "Over periods of a century or more, evidence suggests slight...

hang on, the IPCC said there is no increase over the last 100 years on frequency or intensity of cyclones in the South Pacific. The BOM categorically States the same for cyclones making landfall in Australia. What is your motivation in linking these recent normal events to AGW.

Laymans question here: According to the chart, In the past when there were variations of 100ppm this was estimated to have caused temperature variations of approx 10 degrees. That hasn't happened this time around, and no credible scientists are predicting that. What am I missing?

Surely that chart provides you with enormous comfort?