tropic said:
I am a beginner here and has been reading this thread with a lot of interest.
The question I have, what is considered as reasonable CF- investment? If you think GeorgeA property is too CF- then what is not?
I am thinking of getting an IP around 250K and the rent is 190/week.
So the repayment/year @7% is 17,550 and income is 9,880 (gross) + other expenses. The house in brick and tiles around 30 years old so depreciation is almost nil?
Now, is this also too CF-???
By the way the property is in Perth, if that makes any different to the Eastern State decision making.
******************************************************
Dear Tropic,
Before you invest, I think you will need to consider some of the following basic issues first:
1. What are your own investing objectives?
2. Are you investing for capital growth or for rental yields or both purposes?
3. Which Perth suburb are you looking now and why?
4. What exactly about this property that attract you and why? what are the main key drivers for this property price appreciation?
5. what are the inherent risks involved in this investment?
6. what are the safeguards which you will want to build in to ensure that this property investment will allow you to achieve your intended investing objectives with the minimal risks.
As for the investment education, I will recommend you to read the following books:
a. Jan somers: Creating Wealth through Residential Properties.
b. John FritzGerald : 7 Steps to Wealth
c. Rory O Rourke : Taxed to Death
d. Steve Mcknight : From 0 to 130 Properties in 3.5 Years
e. Margaret Lomas: Positive Cashflow Properties
Once you have finished reading the a/m books, you will find that the term, "positive cashflow" means different things to different people such as Steve Mcknight vis-a-vis Margaret Lomas's definitions and you will be a better position to know how to play the property investing game profitably for yourself. Both Jan Somers and John FritzGerald both advocate investing for capital growth and so do many of the more experienced property investors like Steve Narva etc as compared to investing for yields/Positive Cashflow as advocated by Steve Mcknight. You will also then know how to answer your a/m questions which you as the investor, will actually have to decide for yourself in relation to your intended investing objectives.
I will try to answer some of your queries simply:
a. - CF. Here you will need to understand why some investors actually want or/and does not mind -CF and the concept of negative gearing to maximise one's tax benefits (or rather to legally minimise one's tax liabilities) through property investing. If you read the other thread initated by GeorgeSA, you will know what I mean, when Geroge SA shared about his tax position and implications as a result of his property acquisition.
b. how much -Cf is " reasonable"? - This is dependent on your present tax position and investing objectives. You will need to work out your own figures to dervie the optimal figures and to see if you can afford to comfortably servicing it, and able to continue to hold onto the negatively geared property until you achieved your intended investing objectives.
c. " too much -CF " - when the investor is unable to service the loan interest comfortably and risks being forced-sell his properties/ foreclosed by the banks at a big loss before his investing objectives are achieved.
We will need to know your/your family present income and loan serviciing capacity first before can constructively answer your other questions.
Please note that even a 30 years old house do have some deprecations benefits. You will need to engage a quantity surveyor, to help determine the balance deprecation benefits left remaining and try to maximise it for your own tax benefits purposes before you proceed to have the old house demolished.
I trust I have answered most of your queries in the manner I hope you will find it helpful for your own investment education and impending property investing activities.
Cheers,
Kenneth KOH