This is a pretty loose, dangerous comment to be posting, without any evidence to support it. Where's the stock. What's the stock? What's it priced at? What should it be priced at? etc.... Your post fundamentally implies that all NRAS is overpriced rubbish, so I'm going to have a little bit of a crack at you for it, because I think it's ill founded and unfair of you to draw such a long bow and make comments of that nature without qualifying them.
I've just sold 11 NRAS approved properties on Sydney's Northern beaches, in a very high quality development where EVERY valuation, from EVERY different lender and EVERY different valuation firm came in at the exact Contract Price. CBRE, LMWHegney, OPTEON, MVS, VALUECORP and PROPELL - all on the money. Is this overpriced trash???
This year I've also sold other NRAS approved properties in projects in Zillmere, Townsville and Gladstone QLD , Athol Park and Salisbury North SA, Fairy Meadow, Rosehill and Wentworthville NSW to name a few, where valuations were again, ON THE MONEY... Multiple different lenders, and multiple valuers. Overpriced trash????
Are there occasional valuations that come in low..? yes. Why? Valuers aren't rocket scientists and amazingly, plenty of new rookies coming through who are ultra conservative on new stock, whether it's NRAS or not. And some developers of new stock are unrealistic... it happens. Same as vendors trying to sell existing PPOR's @ unrealistic prices. And the there are the greedy marketers charging 30-40K to flog a bog standard product that deserves 3% comms, not 6-8%. Happens. But I screen everything with up front vals, and I can assure you, there are good NRAS deals to be had...
What I'm saying is; perhaps the developer you had lunch with, and his particular project , is trash... and perhaps he begged, borrowed or stole some NRAS allocations to try and make them a little less unattractive to potential purchasers - but really, posting such comments without qualification serves no purpose but to reinforce an incorrect stigma that NRAS by its nature = crap stock, and it's just patently untrue. It may be true of his particular project and stock, but I think it's important to be a little more careful, and qualify comments more fully, because it certainly isn't true of the kinds of projects I source for clients.