If the strength of AUD is going to act as an anchor on the ASX, is it going to be better to invest in high income yield stocks in the short / medium term, such as banks and QBE?
Most foreigners are playing the yield game through the debt market, especially with government securities, thats why our fed government long term bonds are quite low, they are being heavily bought: long AU$ short US$ or Yen and invest the proceeds in Australian government debt (high yielding compared to other nations, and safe given Australian government debt relative to others). This form the majority of whats referred to as the carry trade.
In regards to stocks,its a more difficult question to answer. One needs to consider how susceptible the underlying company is to the exchange rate. One also needs to consider its future profitability as its future profitability will dictate future dividends. No point buying a 'high yield' if its future profit gets crushed. If future profit gets crushed, then the future dividend will be severely cut, then the logic of owning the stock (the high yield) will cease and on will not only receive a lower yield but take a nice whack from a drop in the share price.
I think one reason that many of the high yielders in the australian market have rececently run is becasue the release of the half year profit reports show that things are not as bad as the market feared, so the market is re-rating the stocks.
But in a low growth environment one has to be very careful chasing stock prices (for investment purposes, traders will try to just catch the momentum and will exit once that momentum plateaus).
In regards to the stocks you highlighted: the banks and QBE.
The banks are probably ok at the moment as part of a diversified portfolio. Their yields are quite good at around 9-10% gross (ie including franking credits), but i dont think their profit will be increasing much in the near term, until lending starts to increase. Lending wont increase until consumers and businesses become more confident. If profit doesnt increase then its hard to see dividends increasing (in fact dividends may decrease since a large proportion of dividends are issued as new shares through DRP, more shares on offer, same lending, same profit will equal lower EPS)
In regards to QBE
Oracle has made some excellent posts re QBE in recent times, search this forum for his posts.
For myself i consider 4 essential elements for QBE
(a)QBE now reports its profits in US$. Given that the AU$ has been appreciating, this has acted as a consistent drag for several years on the AU$ restated profits. So one needs to consider is the AU$ going to continue to appreciate. If so, then AU$ will continue to be under pressure. My view is that the AU$ will gravitate back towards its long term trend of around $0.75-$0.8, but when i dont know. The market will do what the market wants. This is a long term view, using long term views to guess profit performance is dangerous (for example the AU$ could appreciate to US$1.3 in the next two years, then crash to US$0.7 in the third, this will be in accordance with my long term view, but will still hamer the share price in the next two years)
(b) Global interest rates. Whilst global interest rates are low, QBE (as do other insurers) generates a very low return on its funds held (insurers get your money, invest it, and only pay out when there is a claim). I think alot of this risk is already factored into the share price given that interest rates have been low for a year now, and they cant get much lower)
(c) Insurance margins. This is now increasing given the recent spate of significant global insurance catastrophes. This should bode well for future profits, especially if we see a period of lower catastrophes.
(d) Management quality. QBE has consistently been rated in the top global insurance companies for management quality. Factors (a)-(c) have caused the drag on insurance profits, now management quality.
In regards to QBE yield, remember it generates most of its profit overseas. So the dividend you see (unlike the banks) is NOT fully franked. It has lower franking. When looking at yields one should look at gross yields (ie including franking) not net yields, so we can match apples with apples.
Hope this helps.