As you may know, the USA is seeing widespread falls in property prices.
Here is why I believe Australia will fare WORSE than the USA.
-Australia has higher interest rates than the USA
-Australia has a higher percentage of variable rate loans vs fixed
-2/3 of landlords and the landlord industry overall declared a loss last financial year, while the lack of negative gearing means that most US landlords are cashflow positive.
This also means that the property investor business model RELYS on capital gains, meanwhile Australia is now heavily indebted and many people are priced out.
-House prices to income ratios are 3.1 in the USA and over 6 in Australia.
-World bank says Australia has 2nd most overpriced property in the world, compared to rents & wages.
-We have low-doc 100% loans given by non-bank lenders packaged and into international credit markets - just like Subprime. Rams & Bluestone for example.
-Rents have kept track with wages, it is prices that have disconnected from fundamentals causing terrrible yields. Rents would have to double for houses to be worth anywhere near their current price and yield more than the risk-free cash rate. There is no capacity in the renters wages for this to happen.
The supply argument:
-The census shows that construction of new households has exceeded new arrivals divided by average household size (2.6) thus any shortage is due to an increase in demand above long term trends.
-830,000 houses (or 10% of total) were vacant on census night.
-Number of people per dwelling (2.6) has remained the same since the 2001 census.
-The number of households increased by only 80% of the number of new dwellings constructed since 2001, thus in effect 20% of new developments remain empty.
What do you think?
Here is why I believe Australia will fare WORSE than the USA.
-Australia has higher interest rates than the USA
-Australia has a higher percentage of variable rate loans vs fixed
-2/3 of landlords and the landlord industry overall declared a loss last financial year, while the lack of negative gearing means that most US landlords are cashflow positive.
This also means that the property investor business model RELYS on capital gains, meanwhile Australia is now heavily indebted and many people are priced out.
-House prices to income ratios are 3.1 in the USA and over 6 in Australia.
-World bank says Australia has 2nd most overpriced property in the world, compared to rents & wages.
-We have low-doc 100% loans given by non-bank lenders packaged and into international credit markets - just like Subprime. Rams & Bluestone for example.
-Rents have kept track with wages, it is prices that have disconnected from fundamentals causing terrrible yields. Rents would have to double for houses to be worth anywhere near their current price and yield more than the risk-free cash rate. There is no capacity in the renters wages for this to happen.
The supply argument:
-The census shows that construction of new households has exceeded new arrivals divided by average household size (2.6) thus any shortage is due to an increase in demand above long term trends.
-830,000 houses (or 10% of total) were vacant on census night.
-Number of people per dwelling (2.6) has remained the same since the 2001 census.
-The number of households increased by only 80% of the number of new dwellings constructed since 2001, thus in effect 20% of new developments remain empty.
What do you think?