I was chatting to one of the junior PM's that looks after my IP and mentioned that as we'd just finished a big reno we would like a reappraisal of the rent. Tenants are due to finish lease in May, and know that the rent will rise after that.
Well, after about $20k of reno (new kitchen and bathroom), the agent says, "Oh yeah, should be able to get an extra $20/wk now, I'll check with the other PM and get back to you". (from $300/wk to $320/wk for a 3br house - admittedly on a small block - in Mt Lawley / Highgate area, WA).
LOL - the rent would go up at least $20/wk without a reno. It's amazing that someone working in realestate could be so unaware of the state of the market. From our own research online and looking in the papers the missus and I know that comparable properties rent for $350-400/wk, with most that are similar to ours around the $370-380 mark. There are always more expensive and cheaper ones, but $370-$380 seems conservatively on the mark.
Luckily for the agency I am currently with the PM called back. After speaking to the senior PM the estimate was now $380 - $400/wk. A bit higher than my estimate, but still within the range of what we've seen. I wonder if the junior PM does anything more than rental inspections and answering the phone? She was completely off target. If I'd have taken her word that $320 was right it would have cost me over $3000 in rental income over the year (minus r/e fees of course).
So - to get to the point - do your own research, dont just take the agents off-the-cuff words as accurate.
Good luck all
TB
Well, after about $20k of reno (new kitchen and bathroom), the agent says, "Oh yeah, should be able to get an extra $20/wk now, I'll check with the other PM and get back to you". (from $300/wk to $320/wk for a 3br house - admittedly on a small block - in Mt Lawley / Highgate area, WA).
LOL - the rent would go up at least $20/wk without a reno. It's amazing that someone working in realestate could be so unaware of the state of the market. From our own research online and looking in the papers the missus and I know that comparable properties rent for $350-400/wk, with most that are similar to ours around the $370-380 mark. There are always more expensive and cheaper ones, but $370-$380 seems conservatively on the mark.
Luckily for the agency I am currently with the PM called back. After speaking to the senior PM the estimate was now $380 - $400/wk. A bit higher than my estimate, but still within the range of what we've seen. I wonder if the junior PM does anything more than rental inspections and answering the phone? She was completely off target. If I'd have taken her word that $320 was right it would have cost me over $3000 in rental income over the year (minus r/e fees of course).
So - to get to the point - do your own research, dont just take the agents off-the-cuff words as accurate.
Good luck all
TB