Hi all,
I came across a property on the weekend which is an old double fronted Victorian in need of some TLC. The property isn’t listed with an agent and the vendor is quite motivated to sell. There are a few negatives with this property and it isn’t the sort of property I would normally go for. The major negatives are:
1) Property is located beside a railway station
2) These is a busy road a few doors down
3) Parking is very limited
4) Affected by a compulsory acquisition overlay
Several years ago a compulsory acquisition overlay was placed on many of the properties along this train line in lieu of the proposed CBD to Melbourne Airport direct rail link. It is not even guaranteed that this rail link will go ahead and I’ve heard it will be 2010 before a decision is even reached. If the rail link is to go ahead, the owners of any affected properties will be forced to sell to the government at fair market value. Market value will be determined as if the overlay never existed.
The owner of the property tells me that because of this overlay, even if he sells the property now for a significant discount, he will still be compensated for any shortfall. For example, if market value is $300k and he sells to me now for $250k, the government will pay him the $50k shortfall plus some additional concessions. I’ve been told that this compensation payout is on-going, so if I then on-sell it for a discount, I get paid out the shortfall.
Obviously this isn’t the sort of property I would buy-and-hold, but I’m thinking it might be a good buy-reno-sell opportunity, or maybe not? The main concern I have is that there will be a very limited market for this type of property and many don’t want to:
a) Live beside a train line
b) Worry about someone forcing them to give up their home some day
Has anyone had any experience with these compulsory acquisition overlays?
Any feedback would be appreciated.
Regards,
Ozi
I came across a property on the weekend which is an old double fronted Victorian in need of some TLC. The property isn’t listed with an agent and the vendor is quite motivated to sell. There are a few negatives with this property and it isn’t the sort of property I would normally go for. The major negatives are:
1) Property is located beside a railway station
2) These is a busy road a few doors down
3) Parking is very limited
4) Affected by a compulsory acquisition overlay
Several years ago a compulsory acquisition overlay was placed on many of the properties along this train line in lieu of the proposed CBD to Melbourne Airport direct rail link. It is not even guaranteed that this rail link will go ahead and I’ve heard it will be 2010 before a decision is even reached. If the rail link is to go ahead, the owners of any affected properties will be forced to sell to the government at fair market value. Market value will be determined as if the overlay never existed.
The owner of the property tells me that because of this overlay, even if he sells the property now for a significant discount, he will still be compensated for any shortfall. For example, if market value is $300k and he sells to me now for $250k, the government will pay him the $50k shortfall plus some additional concessions. I’ve been told that this compensation payout is on-going, so if I then on-sell it for a discount, I get paid out the shortfall.
Obviously this isn’t the sort of property I would buy-and-hold, but I’m thinking it might be a good buy-reno-sell opportunity, or maybe not? The main concern I have is that there will be a very limited market for this type of property and many don’t want to:
a) Live beside a train line
b) Worry about someone forcing them to give up their home some day
Has anyone had any experience with these compulsory acquisition overlays?
Any feedback would be appreciated.
Regards,
Ozi