Ok but why would any government implement such a policy if it was not in the best interest of the children? What did they have to gain?
It's common knowledge that child abuse exists even today and aboriginal leaders generally turn a blind eye to it.
Think about this one for a moment because it is us who also turn a blind eye to it and we let it continue.
The government saw the aboriginies as a dying race so set up the reserves to take care of them as Wards of the State (with the corresponding lack of rights) and then as a matter of policy systematically removed children, especially those of mixed race.
The issues were discussed quite openly.
For example.
Royal Commission 1913
A Royal Commission was established in 1913 `to inquire into and report upon the control, organisation and management of institutions ... set aside for the benefit of Aborigines'.
There was discussion about the appropriate age at which children of mixed descent should be taken from their families.
The more of those half-caste children you can take away from their parents and place under the care of the State the better ... When they are a couple of years of age they do not require so much attention and they are young enough to be attractive. I am quite aware that you are depriving the mothers of their children, and the mothers are very fond of their children; but I think it must be the rising generation who have to be considered. They are the people who are going to live on (quoted by Mattingley and Hampton 1992 on page 160).
Last edited: