Not Necessarily...
You'd be hard pressed to find two otherwise 'identical' properties as you describe so this becomes a moot point, plus there are other factors besides the proported increase in the value of the underlying land which may drive up the price.
Purchasing OTP may not involve paying a 'premium'
It may just be that you are paying todays prices for something that you are taking possession of 'tomorrow' or sometime in the future.
The sales price for an OTP purchase has to reflect a market price today, otherwise it won't sell.
I have to wonder if you have put any of this into practice or is it just opinionated theorising..
kp
I think you will agree with me that 2 otherwise identical properties (whether houses or units) - one being brand new and the other 3 years old - the new property will sell for a premium. That premium will be lost as the property ages (building component depreciates).
Accordingly if you purchase OTP you pay a premium for a new dwelling which is lost over time. That means that, for dollar for dollar, a OTP dwelling (house or unit) is not as good as an investment for CG purposes as say a dwelling that is at least 4 years old.
*Note that I have not taken depreciation tax consequences into account in making that assessment.
You'd be hard pressed to find two otherwise 'identical' properties as you describe so this becomes a moot point, plus there are other factors besides the proported increase in the value of the underlying land which may drive up the price.
Purchasing OTP may not involve paying a 'premium'
It may just be that you are paying todays prices for something that you are taking possession of 'tomorrow' or sometime in the future.
The sales price for an OTP purchase has to reflect a market price today, otherwise it won't sell.
I have to wonder if you have put any of this into practice or is it just opinionated theorising..
kp