Hi everyone,
I have a tricky question around the First Home Saver Account. I guess it's sort of related to Tax. At least, it's related to the ATO. I was hoping somebody may have come across something similar either for the FHSA or the FHOG in the past.
So one of the criteria for withdrawing from the FHSA is that the person must move into the home within 12 months for at least 6 continuous months.
My brother is in the situation where he has met the other criteria to withdraw from his FHSA, had been searching for a first home, but a few months ago he was transferred to work in Tamworth for 18 months.
He is being paid a living away from home allowance while he is there and he comes back to Newcastle almost every weekend.
His company have indicated that the transfer is to complete a specific project and he will be brought back to Newcastle with continuous employment when it is done.
If he were to find a house he wanted to buy now, would he be able to meet the residency criteria by not renting the house out and living there most weekends or would the ATO consider his "home" for first home benefits purposes to be the unit he is renting in Tamworth, even though he gets a living away from home allowance? The ATO website states that the home must be his "main residence" so I think it's leaning toward no.
The price of entry level properties keeps on climbing around here and we're worried that the longer he waits to buy the harder it will be to afford (and someone else will get the capital growth)
Thanks!
I have a tricky question around the First Home Saver Account. I guess it's sort of related to Tax. At least, it's related to the ATO. I was hoping somebody may have come across something similar either for the FHSA or the FHOG in the past.
So one of the criteria for withdrawing from the FHSA is that the person must move into the home within 12 months for at least 6 continuous months.
My brother is in the situation where he has met the other criteria to withdraw from his FHSA, had been searching for a first home, but a few months ago he was transferred to work in Tamworth for 18 months.
He is being paid a living away from home allowance while he is there and he comes back to Newcastle almost every weekend.
His company have indicated that the transfer is to complete a specific project and he will be brought back to Newcastle with continuous employment when it is done.
If he were to find a house he wanted to buy now, would he be able to meet the residency criteria by not renting the house out and living there most weekends or would the ATO consider his "home" for first home benefits purposes to be the unit he is renting in Tamworth, even though he gets a living away from home allowance? The ATO website states that the home must be his "main residence" so I think it's leaning toward no.
The price of entry level properties keeps on climbing around here and we're worried that the longer he waits to buy the harder it will be to afford (and someone else will get the capital growth)
Thanks!