hi everyone
sorry, but I needed to ask this, it was killing me,,
my understanding is that you - Buy an existing and get $17k from the government ($14k fed and $3k state)
- Buy new and get $26k from the government ($21k fed $5k state) and then also get some stamp duty concessions if off the plan
Now we all know the potential pitfalls with OTP. so if this was for IP#1, say you are looking at an entry level place say about $300k, then the stamp duty in vic is $11k (not too sure why its $13k if its NOT for a PPOR according to the calculator, but then you wouldn';t get the FHOG if you don't live in it right????)
so basically, you are saving $26k+11k=$37k so that is 12.3% for a $300k property that the government helps you out
however if you purchased an existing $300k proprerty then you save yourself $17k out of $300k=5.6% in savings
from a CG perspective and if this was going to be IP#1, taking in to consideration the current crappy economy, would it be safer to buy an existing $300k property to save 5.6% and to pay the extra $20k or to go OTP and to save yourself the $37k in total as opposed to $17k......
lets assume that there is a existing $300k property right next to a OTP $300k new place.
the $20k stamp duty +FHOG saving seems like quite a significance..
so essentialy buying $300k existing will cost you $17k less, while $300k OTP will cost you $37k less....
just seems like it may be worth the risk...
I hope I make sense...
I would really like peoples opinion on this
sorry, but I needed to ask this, it was killing me,,
my understanding is that you - Buy an existing and get $17k from the government ($14k fed and $3k state)
- Buy new and get $26k from the government ($21k fed $5k state) and then also get some stamp duty concessions if off the plan
Now we all know the potential pitfalls with OTP. so if this was for IP#1, say you are looking at an entry level place say about $300k, then the stamp duty in vic is $11k (not too sure why its $13k if its NOT for a PPOR according to the calculator, but then you wouldn';t get the FHOG if you don't live in it right????)
so basically, you are saving $26k+11k=$37k so that is 12.3% for a $300k property that the government helps you out
however if you purchased an existing $300k proprerty then you save yourself $17k out of $300k=5.6% in savings
from a CG perspective and if this was going to be IP#1, taking in to consideration the current crappy economy, would it be safer to buy an existing $300k property to save 5.6% and to pay the extra $20k or to go OTP and to save yourself the $37k in total as opposed to $17k......
lets assume that there is a existing $300k property right next to a OTP $300k new place.
the $20k stamp duty +FHOG saving seems like quite a significance..
so essentialy buying $300k existing will cost you $17k less, while $300k OTP will cost you $37k less....
just seems like it may be worth the risk...
I hope I make sense...
I would really like peoples opinion on this