State - WA
Ideally it would be best to have settlement at end of lease with vacant possession.
If vendor wanted a quick settlement and there was LESS than 3 months left of lease, would buyer have to pay stamp duty at rate of an investment property but not have to worry about CGT implications?
If vendor wanted a quick settlement and there was MORE than 3 months left of lease, would buyer have to pay stamp duty at rate of an investment property AND also consider CGT implications?
Ideally it would be best to have settlement at end of lease with vacant possession.
If vendor wanted a quick settlement and there was LESS than 3 months left of lease, would buyer have to pay stamp duty at rate of an investment property but not have to worry about CGT implications?
If vendor wanted a quick settlement and there was MORE than 3 months left of lease, would buyer have to pay stamp duty at rate of an investment property AND also consider CGT implications?